No open-access location is known for this record yet.
No open-access location is known for this record yet.
This paper uses a quality-assurance framework to unify tFe application of school-effectiveness and school-improvement knowledge to a school system. The paper proposes that effective school development is enhanced by the implementation of quality systems that recognize the stages of performance-development cycles. It discusses quality-assurance systems and the concept of performance-development cycles for organizations and schools. The quality-assurance school review and development program in New South Wales, Australia, attempts to integrate the school-effectiveness and school-improvement knowledge bases to improve student learning outcomes. The systematic school-development approach is comprised of the following: the devolution of authority to individual schools, a context of school networks, a focus on student learning outcomes, and continuous assessment of school practices. A systems approach means th ?t the review and development process must be adapted to an individual school's stage in the performance-development cycle. For example, in the early stages of the performance-development cycle, strategies should focus on aligning school outcomes with specifications. Middle-stage quality-assurance strategies are more effective if they concentrate on monitoring compliance with process and service standards, and later-stage strategies should concentrate on fostering innovation and leadership to tap organizational creativity. Finally, schools must implement second-order changes that restructure processes in order to advance in the performance-development cycle. One figure is included. (Contains 49
Loading…
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.
Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.
Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.