SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Completeness of reporting for systematic reviews of point-of-care ultrasound: a meta-research study
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Completeness of reporting for systematic reviews of point-of-care ultrasound: a meta-research study (2021)Completeness of reporting for systematic …Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)Preferred reporting items for…Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evaluation of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in High–Impact Factor Journals (2020)Overinterpretation of Researc…Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 Guidelines in Acute Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research (2020)Adherence to the Standards fo…Targeted test evaluation: a framework for designing diagnostic accuracy studies with clear study hypotheses (2019)Targeted test evaluation: a f…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Preferred Reporting Items for…Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline (2018)Completeness of Reporting of …Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta‐analyses (2018)Best practices for MRI system…Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 2015 (2017)Reporting of imaging diagnost…Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review (2017)Recommendations for reporting…Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2017)Overinterpretation of Researc…Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement? (2013)Association of Study Quality …QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)Systematic Reviews of Diagnos…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2009)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study (2016)Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (2017)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines (2019)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD): a survey of four journals in laboratory medicine (2021)Small Study Effects in Diagnostic Imaging Accuracy (2022)Defining the review question (2023)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Accuracy of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for screening to detect major depression: updated systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis (2021)Introduction to PRISMA 2020 and implications for research synthesis methodologists (2021)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force (2022)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.48,853 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,718 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,995 cited
  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,549 cited
  • 2018Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies3,255 cited
  • 2008Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy1,124 cited
  • 2020Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist736 cited
  • 2013Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement?146 cited
  • 2017Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review142 cited
  • 2019Targeted test evaluation: a framework for designing diagnostic accuracy studies with clear study hypotheses77 cited
  • 2017Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evidence of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies72 cited
  • 2017Reporting of imaging diagnostic accuracy studies with focus on MRI subgroup: Adherence to STARD 201559 cited
  • 2018

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline
37 cited
  • 2018Best practices for MRI systematic reviews and meta‐analyses36 cited
  • 2020Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 Guidelines in Acute Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research35 cited
  • 2020Overinterpretation of Research Findings: Evaluation of “Spin” in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in High–Impact Factor Journals23 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.