Comparability and Validity of the Online and In-Person Administrations of the Inventory of Problems-29

Luciano Giromini · Claudia Pignolo · Gerald C. Young · Eric York Drogin · Alessandro Zennaro · Donald J. Viglione

20 citations0/0 files storedPsychological Injury and Law

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Deception detection and forensic psychology

Abstract

Abstract While the psychometric equivalence of computerized versus paper-and-pencil administration formats has been documented for some tests, so far very few studies have focused on the comparability and validity of test scores obtained via in-person versus remote administrations, and none of them have researched a symptom validity test (SVT). To contribute to fill this gap in the literature, we investigated the scores of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) generated by various administration formats. More specifically, Study 1 evaluated the equivalence of scores from nonclinical individuals administered the IOP-29 remotely ( n = 146) versus in-person via computer ( n = 140) versus in-person via paper-and-pencil format ( n = 140). Study 2 reviewed published IOP-29 studies conducted using remote/online versus in-person, paper-and-pencil test administrations to determine if remote testing could adversely influence the validity of IOP-29 test results. Taken together, our findings suggest that the effectiveness of the IOP-29 is preserved when alternating between face-to-face and online/remote formats.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 20 citations exist upstream.

References

2021The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.1995Neuropsychological assessment.1995Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed.1989MMPI-2 : Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 : manual for administration and scoring 1988Clinical assessment of malingering and deception 2003Detection of Malingering Using Atypical Performance Patterns on Standard Neuropsychological Tests 2000The Test of Memory Malingering 2 (TOMM-2)1990Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception Clinical Assessment of Malingering and Deception RogersRichard, Editor (1988). The Guilford Press, 72 Spring Street, New York, NY 10012. 370 pp., $39.50.

Cited by

2022Assessing Negative Response Bias with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29): a Quantitative Literature Review 2022Can the Rorschach be Administered Remotely? A Review of Options and a Pilot Study Using a Newly Developed R-PAS App 2024Using the MMPI-2-RF, IOP-29, IOP-M, and FIT in the In-Person and Remote Administration Formats: A Simulation Study on Feigned mTBI 2025Examining the Impact of In-Person and Remote Administration Modality on Free-Standing and Embedded Performance Validity Test Scores in Neuropsychological Assessment

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.