References

• 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,975 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision2,681 cited
• 2011GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias1,817 cited
• 2011Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials439 cited
• 2013The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses371 cited
• 2015Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review259 cited
• 2007Association Between Unreported Outcomes and Effect Size Estimates in Cochrane Meta-analyses116 cited
• 2019Comparison of Clinical Trial Changes in Primary Outcome and Reported Intervention Effect Size Between Trial Registration and Publication68 cited
• 2014A meta‐epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials46 cited
• 2012Academic output of 9 years of EU investment into health research39 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.