SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

splithalf: robust estimates of split half reliability · Study

ArticleShelves

Articlesplithalf: robust estimates of split half reliability

Sam D. Parsons2021

OA

Articlediamond2021

splithalf: robust estimates of split half reliability

142 citations·0/0 files stored·The Journal of Open Source Software

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 142 citations exist upstream.

References

1904The Proof and Measurement of Association between Two Things 2017The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences 2019Psychological Science Needs a Standard Practice of Reporting the Reliability of Cognitive-Behavioral Measurements

Cited by

2021Methods to split cognitive task data for estimating split-half reliability: A comprehensive review and systematic assessment 2021Data quality and reliability metrics for event-related potentials (ERPs): The utility of subject-level reliability 2021Evaluating the internal consistency of subtraction‐based and residualized difference scores: Considerations for psychometric reliability analyses of event‐related potentials 2025Prediction of intrinsic and extraneous cognitive load with oculometric and biometric indicators 2024No Evidence of Reliability Across 36 Variations of the Emotional Dot-Probe Task in 9,600 Participants 2022Exploring reliability heterogeneity with multiverse analyses: Data processing decisions unpredictably influence measurement reliability 2021Effects of go/no-go training on food-related action tendencies, liking and choice 2023Thinking about your future self: Do better perspective-takers make more patient decisions?

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2019The Reliability of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in Clinical Practicearticle · 3 shared references 2021Raising awareness about measurement error in research on unconscious mental processesreview · 3 shared references 2022Exploring reliability heterogeneity with multiverse analyses: Data processing decisions unpredictably influence measurement reliabilityarticle · 3 shared references 2021The bright homunculus in our head: Individual differences in intuitive sensitivity to logical validityarticle · 3 shared references 2020The Bright Homunculus in our Head: Individual Differences in Intuitive Sensitivity to Logical Validitypreprint · 3 shared references 2019Large-scale analysis of test–retest reliabilities of self-regulation measuresreview · 2 shared references

Details

Year2021

Typearticle

Published2021-04-23

VenueThe Journal of Open Source Software

ISSN-L2475-9066

Languageen

Citations142

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Identifiers

doi10.21105/joss.03041

openalex_workW3163045346

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.