COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EXISTING METHODS FOR DEVELOPING CORRESPONDENCE MATRICES

Abstract

The study is aimed at comparing the methods of restoring correspondence matri ces, the traditional transport school and modern mobile technologies. Traditionally, correspondence matrices are restored by interviewing vehicle drivers and applying gravity models (to extrapolate and fill in unobserved movements), then matrix estimation methods are used to calculate traffic flows. Each of these approaches has a number of advantages and disadvantages, but there is no evidence to assess the quality of the data obtained.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 2 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.