References

• 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
• 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
• 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,189 cited
• 2016ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions20,225 cited
• 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
• 2010Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,176 cited
• 2014SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies4,393 cited
• 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration3,375 cited
• 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
• 1997Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures2,413 cited
• 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
• 2017Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study2,104 cited
• 2008Metan: Fixed- and Random-Effects Meta-Analysis1,026 cited
• 1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research