References

• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
• 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
• 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
• 2008Undue reliance on I 2 in assessing heterogeneity may mislead1,286 cited
• 2016Meta-analysis using individual participant data: one-stage and two-stage approaches, and why they may differ537 cited
• 2002Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head469 cited
• 2009Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews395 cited
• 2002A comparison of summary patient-level covariates in meta-regression with individual patient data meta-analysis394 cited
• 2014Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized trials: principles and pitfalls247 cited
• 2004Meta-regression detected associations between heterogeneous treatment effects and study-level, but not patient-level, factors245 cited
• 1997Investigating underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analysis227 cited
• 2017Meta-analytical methods to identify who benefits most from treatments: daft, deluded, or deft approach?219 cited
• 1998An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials