Chomsky and Usage‐Based Linguistics

Abstract

This chapter attempts to unravel the differences, whether real or merely apparent, between Chomsky's linguistics and usage-based linguistics (UBL). The principal alternative to generative grammar in the world today is a broad umbrella of approaches that fall under the general heading of UBL. UBL is the successor to a Piagetian approach to language acquisition, where experience and general learning principles shape the acquisition process. Functionalism takes the position that properties of grammatical systems are explicable in terms of properties of systems that lie outside of grammar per se. The chapter discusses that the few direct references Chomsky has made to usage-based linguistics. It presents the most important issues, one-by-one, that separate Chomsky's views from those of UBLists. They are the explananda of linguistic theory, grammar design and architecture, semantics, language acquisition and innately-provided linguistic constructs, functional explanation, and the sources of data on which a linguistic theory might be constructed.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.