SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Challenges in Identifying the Retracted Status of an Article
3 references·7 citing·31 second hop
Challenges in Identifying the Retracted Status of an Article (2021)Challenges in Identifying the Retracted S…Post retraction citations in context: a case study (2017)Post retraction citations in …An investigation of retracted articles in the biomedical literature (2016)An investigation of retracted…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…The Citation of Retracted Papers and Impact on the Integrity of the Scientific Biomedical Literature (2025)The Citation of Retracted Pap…Comparing the performance of Retraction Watch Database, PubMed, and Web of Science in identifying retracted publications in medicine (2025)Comparing the performance of …Reducing the spread of retracted pain research (2024)Reducing the spread of retrac…Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health (2024)Identification of retracted p…Assessing the agreement in retraction indexing across 4 multidisciplinary sources: Crossref, Retraction Watch, Scopus, and Web of Science (2023)Assessing the agreement in re…Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project (2021)Recommendations from the Redu…Addressing disorder in scholarly communication: Strategies from NISO Plus 2021 (2021)Addressing disorder in schola…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Intentionality (1983)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)The continued citation of retracted publications in dentistry (2020)A cross-disciplinary and severity-based study of author-related reasons for retraction (2021)Fraud in scientific publications in the European Union. An analysis through their retractions. (2021)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Temporal characteristics of retracted articles (2018)The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 (2019)Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2011)Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis (2019)The Citation of Retracted COVID-19 Papers is Common and Rarely Critical (2022)Guidelines for retracting articles (2009)A Comprehensive Survey of Retracted Articles from the Scholarly Literature (2012)How swamped preprint servers are blocking bad coronavirus research (2020)Continued post-retraction citation of a fraudulent clinical trial report, 11 years after it was retracted for falsifying data (2020)Continued use of retracted papers: Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (2021)Inconsistent and incomplete retraction of published research: A cross-sectional study on Covid-19 retractions and recommendations to mitigate risks for research, policy and practice (2021)The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty (2005)Public health and public trust: Survey evidence from the Ebola Virus Disease epidemic in Liberia (2016)Inclusion of Retracted Studies in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Interventions (2025)Why Growing Retractions Are (Mostly) a Good Sign (2013)More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 — a new record (2023)Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies17,756 cited
  • 2017Post retraction citations in context: a case study191 cited
  • 2016An investigation of retracted articles in the biomedical literature36 cited

Cited by

  • 2024Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health32 cited
  • 2024Reducing the spread of retracted pain research15 cited
  • 2025The Citation of Retracted Papers and Impact on the Integrity of the Scientific Biomedical Literature14 cited
  • 2025Comparing the performance of Retraction Watch Database, PubMed, and Web of Science in identifying retracted publications in medicine14 cited
  • 2021Recommendations from the Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: Shaping a Research and Implementation Agenda Project13 cited
  • 2023Assessing the agreement in retraction indexing across 4 multidisciplinary sources: Crossref, Retraction Watch, Scopus, and Web of Science10 cited
  • 2021Addressing disorder in scholarly communication: Strategies from NISO Plus 20215 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work