SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Public access to protocols of contemporary cancer randomized clinical trials
6 references·0 citing·28 second hop
Public access to protocols of contemporary cancer randomized clinical trials (2021)Public access to protocols of contemporar…Availability of study protocols for randomized trials published in high-impact medical journals: A cross-sectional analysis (2019)Availability of study protoco…Public availability of trial protocols (2017)Public availability of trial …From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology (2015)From Protocols to Publication…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials (2006)Lead editorial: Trials – usin…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Clinical Trial Registration (2004)Standard 2: Containing Risk of Bias (2012)Making research articles fit for purpose: structured reporting of key methods and findings (2015)The natural history of conducting and reporting clinical trials: interviews with trialists (2015)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)A Framework for Improving the Quality of Research in the Biological Sciences (2016)Evidence of selective reporting bias in hematology journals: A systematic review (2017)Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs (2017)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Analysis of articles directly related to randomized trials finds poor protocol availability and inconsistent linking of articles (2020)A meta-research study of randomized controlled trials found infrequent and delayed availability of protocols (2022)Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2004)Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials (2011)Evidence of unexplained discrepancies between planned and conducted statistical analyses: a review of randomised trials (2020)Cluster randomized trials of individual-level interventions were at high risk of bias (2021)Publication of Results of Registered Trials With Published Study Protocols, 2011-2022 (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2015From Protocols to Publications: A Study in Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials in Oncology59 cited
  • 2019Availability of study protocols for randomized trials published in high-impact medical journals: A cross-sectional analysis37 cited
  • 2006Lead editorial: Trials – using the opportunities of electronic publishing to improve the reporting of randomised trials33 cited
  • 2017Public availability of trial protocols18 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work