SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Visualization and Mapping of Knowledge and Science Landscapes in Expert Systems With Applications Journal: A 30 Years’ Bibliometric Analysis
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Visualization and Mapping of Knowledge and Science Landscapes in Expert Systems With Applications Journal: A 30 Years’ Bibliometric Analysis (2021)Visualization and Mapping of Knowledge an…Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Google Scholar, Web of Scienc…Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 (2015)Fuzzy multiple criteria decis…Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review (2012)Risk evaluation approaches in…Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature (2012)Application of decision-makin…A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications (2012)A state-of the-art survey of …Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process (2011)Review of the main developmen…A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers (2011)A novel hybrid MCDM approach …Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Software survey: VOSviewer, a…A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method (2009)A multi-criteria intuitionist…Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights (2008)Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS app…Application of data mining techniques in customer relationship management: A literature review and classification (2008)Application of data mining te…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL (2006)Evaluating intertwined effect…Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method (2006)Developing global managers’ c…Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment (2005)Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on …An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…Multiple Attribute Decision Making (1981)Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications (1981)Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys (2005)An Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods (2013)Multiple criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature from 2000 to 2014 (2015)A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems (2018)How information gives you competitive advantage (1985)Intuitionistic fuzzy sets (1986)Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators (2007)Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets (2014)Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method (2018)The Varimax Criterion for Analytic Rotation in Factor Analysis (1958)The analytic hierarchy process : planning, priority setting, resource allocation (1980)Fuzzy sets (1996)A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan (2006)Using DEMATEL to develop a carbon management model of supplier selection in green supply chain management (2011)DEMATEL Technique: A Systematic Review of the State-of-the-Art Literature on Methodologies and Applications (2018)Fuzzy sets (1965)Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences (1984)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1985)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1994)The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications (2010)STATE OF ART SURVEYS OF OVERVIEWS ON MCDM/MADM METHODS (2014)A bibliometric-based survey on AHP and TOPSIS techniques (2017)Managerial Applications of Neural Networks: The Case of Bank Failure Predictions (1992)Data Mining Techniques: For Marketing, Sales, and Customer Relationship Management (2004)Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems (2006)Business intelligence in banking: A literature analysis from 2002 to 2013 using text mining and latent Dirichlet allocation (2014)Big data and disaster management: a systematic review and agenda for future research (2017)A survey towards an integration of big data analytics to big insights for value-creation (2018)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes (1976)Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping21,418 cited
  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 2012A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications2,721 cited
  • 2018Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories1,986 cited
  • 2009A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making for supplier selection with TOPSIS method1,500 cited
  • 2006Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: A novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL1,270 cited
  • 2008Application of data mining techniques in customer relationship management: A literature review and classification1,267 cited
  • 2006Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method1,249 cited
  • 2011Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process1,240 cited
  • 2012Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature983 cited
  • 2008Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights973 cited
  • 2011A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers971 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2012
Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review
969 cited
  • 2015Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014953 cited
  • 2005Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment896 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.