Mitigating the dark side of agile teams: Peer pressure, leaders’ control, and the innovative output of agile teams

Saeed Khanagha · Henk Volberda · Andreas Alexiou · María Carmela Annosi

88 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Product Innovation Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Team Dynamics and Performance Accounting and Organizational Management Software Engineering Techniques and Practices

Abstract

Abstract Increasingly, organizations have been employing self‐managing teams to circumvent bureaucratic controls and stimulate innovation. However, this goal is not easily achieved; in many situations, informal controls replace formal controls. This study develops a multi‐level perspective of control. We explicitly analyze control mechanisms at different levels of the organization and how they affect innovative team output. We theorize and empirically investigate a potential downside of horizontal social control mechanisms at the team level (i.e., peer pressure) affecting self‐managing teams’ innovative outcomes. We also discuss managerial control mechanisms at the organizational level (i.e., interactive and diagnostic management control systems) that may help to mitigate such negative effects. We theorize how they may influence the innovative output of self‐managing teams, both directly and interactively. We chose a multi‐level, multi‐source setting for our study and ran three parallel surveys with employees in a Fortune 500 firm where 248 team members, 126 internal team leaders, and 97 organizational leaders enabled us to create a unique database of 97 self‐managing software development teams. Our findings confirm that peer pressure is common among established agile teams and that it negatively influences the innovative output of the agile teams. Moreover, our findings show that the magnitude of the effect of peer pressure is contingent on control mechanisms at higher levels within the organization. This enables us to provide new theoretical insights regarding the paradoxical effect of managerial control systems when it comes to flat organizations and autonomous teams. Additionally, we provide practical guidelines for managers who increasingly adopt agile practices but at the same time face issues with regard to innovation.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 88 citations exist upstream.

References

1980Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 1991Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning 1976Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory 1969Social Theory and Social Structure.1978Men and Women of the Corporation 2003A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research 1985The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality 2000Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions

Cited by

2022The human side of innovation management: Bridging the divide between the fields of innovation management and organizational behavior 2022Strategic Practice Drift: How Open Strategy Infiltrates the Strategy Process 2021Achieving Agility in High-Reputation Firms: Agile Experimentation Revisited

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.