SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Application of weighting methods for presenting risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies
16 references·0 citing·37 second hop
Application of weighting methods for presenting risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies (2021)Application of weighting methods for pres…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments (2020)Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (r…Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Updated guidance for trusted …RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence (2017)The GRADE Working Group clari…Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality (2017)Systematic review adherence t…ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)ROBIS: A new tool to assess r…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008)Systematic Reviews of Diagnos…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)The performance of tests of p…The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)The development of QUADAS: a …On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions (2001)On the bias produced by quali…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations (2001)A hierarchical regression app…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Optimal cut-off score for diagnosing depression with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): a meta-analysis (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Analysing and Presenting Results (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)Improving sleep quality leads to better mental health: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)PROBAST: A Tool to Assess the Risk of Bias and Applicability of Prediction Model Studies (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
  • 2019Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions7,170 cited
  • 2020Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessments5,557 cited
  • 2003The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews3,593 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 2005The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed2,906 cited
  • 2015ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed2,266 cited
  • 2001A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations1,509 cited
  • 2008Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy1,124 cited
  • 2017The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence847 cited
  • 2023

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
755 cited
  • 2001On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions359 cited
  • 2017Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality322 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.