SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Author-Suggested, Weighted Citation Index: A Novel Approach for Determining the Contribution of Individual Researchers
16 references·0 citing·36 second hop
Author-Suggested, Weighted Citation Index: A Novel Approach for Determining the Contribution of Individual Researchers (2021)Author-Suggested, Weighted Citation Index…Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scop…Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators (2020)Updated science-wide author d…How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)How can we ensure visibility …Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)Transparency in authors’ cont…Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Evaluation practices and effe…Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Beyond authorship: attributio…Publishing: Credit where credit is due (2014)Publishing: Credit where cred…Collaboration and Team Science: From Theory to Practice (2012)Collaboration and Team Scienc…Metrics: Do metrics matter? (2010)Metrics: Do metrics matter?To share the fame in a fair way, h m modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts (2008)To share the fame in a fair w…A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts (2008)A modification of the h-index…Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)Does the h index have predict…Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? (2006)Is it possible to compare res…An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)An index to quantify an indiv…When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)When authorship fails. A prop…When Authorship Fails (1997)When Authorship FailsDialogue across Differences: Continuing the Conversation (1991)The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings (2001)A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. (2003)Assessing the Value of Team Science (2012)From Sole Investigator to Team Scientist: Trends in the Practice and Study of Research Collaboration (2016)Future Directions in Understanding and Addressing Mental Health among LGBTQ Youth (2020)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution (1998)The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level (2007)The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index (2007)Mapping the Evolution of Social Research and Data Science on 30 Years of Social Indicators Research (2020)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)On Justification (2006)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Governing Science (2016)A review of literature on evaluating the scientific, social and political impact of social sciences and humanities research (2017)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Preferred reporting items for overviews of systematic reviews including harms checklist: a pilot tool to be used for balanced reporting of benefits and harms (2017)Replication across space and time must be weak in the social and environmental sciences (2021)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)Literature reviews as independent studies: guidelines for academic practice (2022)The Science of Literature Reviews: Searching, Identifying, Selecting, and Synthesising (2023)Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)Why do Some Countries Publish More Than Others? An International Comparison of Research Funding, English Proficiency and Publication Output in Highly Ranked General Medical Journals (2004)A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
  • 2021Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World2,676 cited
  • 2007Does the h index have predictive power?973 cited
  • 2015Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit650 cited
  • 1997When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable566 cited
  • 2006Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?548 cited
  • 2015Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review466 cited
  • 2012Collaboration and Team Science: From Theory to Practice439 cited
  • 1997When Authorship Fails401 cited
  • 2018Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication390 cited
  • 2014Publishing: Credit where credit is due351 cited
  • 2019How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship311 cited
  • 2010Metrics: Do metrics matter?261 cited
  • 2020Updated science-wide author databases of standardized citation indicators237 cited
  • 2008

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

A modification of the h-index: The hm-index accounts for multi-authored manuscripts
232 cited
  • 2008To share the fame in a fair way, h m modifies h for multi-authored manuscripts154 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.