SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Effect of spin in the abstract of a randomised controlled trial on physiotherapists’ perception of treatment benefit: a randomised controlled trial
13 references·1 citing·47 second hop
Effect of spin in the abstract of a randomised controlled trial on physiotherapists’ perception of treatment benefit: a randomised controlled trial (2021)Effect of spin in the abstract of a rando…The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: a case study on abstract reporting bias (2019)The strong focus on positive …Abstracts of Low Back Pain Trials Are Poorly Reported, Contain Spin of Information, and Are Inconsistent With the Full Text: An Overview Study (2019)Abstracts of Low Back Pain Tr…Influence of overstated abstract conclusions on clinicians: a web-based randomised controlled trial (2017)Influence of overstated abstr…A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research (2017)A scoping review of compariso…‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review (2017)‘Spin’ in published biomedica…Spin kills science (2015)Spin kills scienceImpact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Impact of Spin in the Abstrac…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals (2008)The quality of reporting of t…G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (2007)G*Power 3: A flexible statist…What are the implications of optimism bias in clinical research? (2006)What are the implications of …Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence (2003)Effect of interpretive bias o…Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles (1999)Accuracy of Data in Abstracts…Over-interpretation of findings in diagnostic accuracy studies of infectious diseases (2023)Over-interpretation of findin…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015)Reference bias in reports of drug trials. (1987)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Evaluation of networks of randomized trials (2007)Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis (2014)Book Reviews: Keppel, Geoffrey. Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook . Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1973. 658 + xiii pp. $13.95 (1975)Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook (1975)GPOWER: A general power analysis program (1996)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies (2015)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (1998)Return to Reason (2001)Including gaming disorder in the ICD-11: The need to do so from a clinical and public health perspective (2018)The limited prosocial effects of meditation: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2018)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Use of positive and negative words in scientific PubMed abstracts between 1974 and 2014: retrospective analysis (2015)CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals (2012)Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis (2012)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)CONSORT-SPI 2018 Explanation and Elaboration: guidance for reporting social and psychological intervention trials (2018)Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models (2023)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Spinning the Genome: Why Science Hype Matters (2018)A tutorial on methodological studies: the what, when, how and why (2020)Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC) (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)MyCites: a proposal to mark and report inaccurate citations in scholarly publications (2020)Using the full PICO model as a search tool for systematic reviews resulted in lower recall for some PICO elements (2020)Around ten percent of most recent Cochrane reviews included outcomes in their literature search strategy and were associated with potentially exaggerated results: A research-on-research study (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences66,707 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes833 cited
  • 2014Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial366 cited
  • 2017‘Spin’ in published biomedical literature: A methodological systematic review314 cited
  • 1999Accuracy of Data in Abstracts of Published Research Articles300 cited
  • 2003Effect of interpretive bias on research evidence232 cited
  • 2008The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals133 cited
  • 2006What are the implications of optimism bias in clinical research?95 cited
  • 2017A scoping review of comparisons between abstracts and full reports in primary biomedical research75 cited
  • 2019The strong focus on positive results in abstracts may cause bias in systematic reviews: a case study on abstract reporting bias40 cited
  • 2019Abstracts of Low Back Pain Trials Are Poorly Reported, Contain Spin of Information, and Are Inconsistent With the Full Text: An Overview Study30 cited
  • 2017Influence of overstated abstract conclusions on clinicians: a web-based randomised controlled trial14 cited
  • 2015Spin kills science11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

  • 2023Over-interpretation of findings in diagnostic accuracy studies of infectious diseases5 cited