Citation map · Study

Critical evaluation of reporting quality of network meta-analyses assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture

16 references·1 citing·37 second hopsampled

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
2010Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement1,391 cited
2013Conceptual and Technical Challenges in Network Meta-analysis1,071 cited
2016Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians871 cited
2017Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons409 cited
2011Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed361 cited
2012How to Use an Article Reporting a Multiple Treatment Comparison Meta-analysis360 cited
2014Indirect Treatment Comparison/Network Meta-Analysis Study Questionnaire to Assess Relevance and Credibility to Inform Health Care Decision Making: An ISPOR-AMCP-NPC Good Practice Task Force Report318 cited
2016Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015138 cited
2014Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks127 cited
2013Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

References

Cited by