SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Controversy and Debate : Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 4 :Odds Ratios are far from “portable” — A call to use realistic models for effect variation in meta-analysis
14 references·0 citing·45 second hop
Controversy and Debate : Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 4 :Odds Ratios are far from “portable” — A call to use realistic models for effect variation in meta-analysis (2021)Controversy and Debate : Questionable uti…Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 2: Is the Odds Ratio “portable” in meta-analysis? Time to consider bivariate generalized linear mixed model (2021)Controversy and Debate: Quest…Zero‐cell corrections in random‐effects meta‐analyses (2020)Zero‐cell corrections in rand…Meta-Analysis and Sparse-Data Bias (2020)Meta-Analysis and Sparse-Data…Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 1: A call for change to practice (2020)Controversy and Debate: Quest…Scientists rise up against statistical significance (2019)Scientists rise up against st…Is the Risk Difference Really a More Heterogeneous Measure? (2015)Is the Risk Difference Really…Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. (2012)Statistics corner: A guide to…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R…Bivariate random effects models for meta-analysis of comparative studies with binary outcomes: Methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk (2010)Bivariate random effects mode…Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach (2006)Bivariate meta-analysis of se…An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials (1998)An empirical study of the eff…Variation in baseline risk as an explanation of heterogeneity in meta-analysis (1997)Variation in baseline risk as…“Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials”: Discussion. A clinician's perspective on meta-analyses (1995)“Large-scale randomized evide…Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Systematic Review: Why source…Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (2002)Socioeconomic Inequalities in Depression: A Meta-Analysis (2003)Long-term mental health of war-refugees: a systematic literature review (2015)Measurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies (1983)Brain-to-Brain Synchrony during Naturalistic Social Interactions (2017)Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation (2018)The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Resilience of Sustainable Mobility in Sicily (2020)Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (2002)What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data (2004)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Screening for Depression in Medical Settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis (2007)Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data (2010)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2023)QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN THE REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC LITERATURE1 (1987)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Investigating causes of heterogeneity in systematic reviews (2002)Language of publication restrictions in systematic reviews gave different results depending on whether the intervention was conventional or complementary (2005)Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature (2012)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Meta‐analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta‐binomial distributions and bivariate copulas (2013)Graphical augmentations to sample‐size‐based funnel plot in meta‐analysis (2019)Exclusion of studies with no events in both arms in meta-analysis impacted the conclusions (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Statistical Crisis in Science (2014)How should systematic reviewers handle conference abstracts? A view from the trenches (2019)Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: An evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals (2020)Rewriting results sections in the language of evidence (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 2: Methods used to assess harms are neglected in systematic reviews of gabapentin (2021)Meta-analysis with zero-event studies: a comparative study with application to COVID-19 data (2021)Appealing to motivation to change attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 702 experimental tests of the effects of motivational message matching on persuasion. (2022)An Assessment of Clinically Useful Measures of the Consequences of Treatment (1988)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)How to Write Statistical Analysis Section in Medical Research (2022)Methods for deriving risk difference (absolute risk reduction) from a meta-analysis (2023)Investigating the impact of trial retractions on the healthcare evidence ecosystem (VITALITY Study I): retrospective cohort study (2025)Meta-regression Approaches: What, Why, When, and How? (2004)Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalyses (2005)Extending methods for investigating the relationship between treatment effect and baseline risk from pairwise meta‐analysis to network meta‐analysis (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,412 cited
  • 2012Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research.4,239 cited
  • 2019Scientists rise up against statistical significance2,997 cited
  • 1994Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated1,016 cited
  • 2006Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach709 cited
  • 1998An empirical study of the effect of the control rate as a predictor of treatment efficacy in meta-analysis of clinical trials217 cited
  • 2020Zero‐cell corrections in random‐effects meta‐analyses155 cited
  • 2020Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 1: A call for change to practice150 cited
  • 1997Variation in baseline risk as an explanation of heterogeneity in meta-analysis80 cited
  • 2010Bivariate random effects models for meta-analysis of comparative studies with binary outcomes: Methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk78 cited
  • 2015Is the Risk Difference Really a More Heterogeneous Measure?46 cited
  • 2020Meta-Analysis and Sparse-Data Bias43 cited
  • 1995“Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials”: Discussion. A clinician's perspective on meta-analyses34 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2021
Controversy and Debate: Questionable utility of the relative risk in clinical research: Paper 2: Is the Odds Ratio “portable” in meta-analysis? Time to consider bivariate generalized linear mixed model
28 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.