SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Towards an Open Science definition as a political and legal framework: on the sharing and dissemination of research outputs
8 references·0 citing·40 second hop
Towards an Open Science definition as a political and legal framework: on the sharing and dissemination of research outputs (2020)Towards an Open Science definition as a p…The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment (2019)The Economic Impacts of Open …On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure (2019)On the evaluation of research…El Factor de Impacto de las revistas científicas sigue siendo ese número que devora la ciencia española: ¿hasta cuándo? (2019)El Factor de Impacto de las r…The state of the art in peer review (2018)The state of the art in peer …Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Open Science now: A systemati…The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review (2016)The Peer Reviewers' Openness …Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought (2013)Open Science: One Term, Five …Open Science and Closed Science: Tradeoffs in a Democracy (1985)Open Science and Closed Scien…Citizen science: a study of people, expertise and sustainable development (1996)The Politics of Talk (2006)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation (2019)Transparency in artificial intelligence (2020)Norms and ideology in science (1976)The subjective side of science (1976)The Manufacture of Knowledge (1981)The Management and Dynamics of Anomalies in Scientific Work (1987)Evaluating transformative research programmes: A case study of the NSF Small Grants for Exploratory Research programme (2013)From funding agencies to scientific agency (2014)Scientific Utopia (2012)Promoting an open research culture (2015)Detecting and avoiding likely false‐positive findings – a practical guide (2016)A Large-Scale Test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis (2017)Exploratory Research (2020)Toward a new economics of science (1994)Open innovation : researching a new paradigm (2006)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review (2020)The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support (2020)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review (2019)AI-assisted peer review (2021)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Challenges of evidence synthesis during the 2020 COVID pandemic: a scoping review (2021)Open science at the science–policy interface: bringing in the evidence? (2022)An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations (2024)Best Practices for Scientific Computing (2014)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)The Research Software Encyclopedia: A Community Framework to Define Research Software (2022)Medidas insuficientes para un cambio en la evalua-ción de la investigación en España: glosando las nuevas directrices de la ANECA (2021)The footprint of a metrics-based research evaluation system on Spain’s philosophical scholarship: An analysis of researchers’ perceptions (2022)La ruta de oro de la publicación científica: del negocio de las revistas a las revistas negocio (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition709 cited
  • 2013Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought678 cited
  • 2016The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review284 cited
  • 2018The state of the art in peer review171 cited
  • 1985Open Science and Closed Science: Tradeoffs in a Democracy88 cited
  • 2019The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment55 cited
  • 2019El Factor de Impacto de las revistas científicas sigue siendo ese número que devora la ciencia española: ¿hasta cuándo?34 cited
  • 2019On the evaluation of research software: the CDUR procedure19 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work