SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An environmental scan of librarian involvement in systematic reviews at Queen’s University: 2020 update
13 references·6 citing·45 second hop
An environmental scan of librarian involvement in systematic reviews at Queen’s University: 2020 update (2021)An environmental scan of librarian involv…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements (2019)Meeting the review family: ex…Librarian Co-Authored Systematic Reviews are Associated with Lower Risk of Bias Compared to Systematic Reviews with Acknowledgement of Librarians or No Participation by Librarians (2019)Librarian Co-Authored Systema…Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services (2019)Building capacity for librari…Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review (2018)Roles for librarians in syste…It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks (2018)It takes longer than you thin…A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries (2018)A review of recent publicatio…Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews (2016)Impact of librarians on repor…Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews (2015)Librarian co-authors correlat…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. (2005)Systematic reviews need syste…Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey (2004)Optimal search strategies for…Benchmarking Librarian Support of Systematic Reviews in the Sciences, Humanities, and Social Sciences (2024)Benchmarking Librarian Suppor…The case of the disappearing librarians: analyzing documentation of librarians’ contributions to systematic reviews (2023)The case of the disappearing …Evidence-based biomedical research in Sub-Saharan Africa: how library and information science professionals contribute to systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2022)Evidence-based biomedical res…Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor (2021)Search is a verb: systematic …International health library associations urge the ICMJE to seek information specialists as peer reviewers for knowledge synthesis publications (2021)International health library …Continuing education for systematic reviews: a prospective longitudinal assessment of a workshop for librarians (2020)Continuing education for syst…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? (2000)A structured approach to documenting a search strategy for publication: A 12 step guideline for authors (2012)Google Scholar as replacement for systematic literature searches: good relative recall and precision are not enough (2013)Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide (2019)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors (2015)Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval (2019)Music therapy for stress reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values (2001)Model Transparency and Validation (2012)Model Transparency and Validation: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7 (2012)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Tips for Improving the Writing and Reporting Quality of Systematic, Scoping, and Narrative Reviews (2019)Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviews (2024)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)Systematic reviews: A brief historical overview (2018)Characteristics of systematic reviews in the social sciences (2021)Relative Citation Impact of Various Study Designs in the Health Sciences (2005)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)Protocol registration issues of systematic review and meta-analysis studies: a survey of global researchers (2020)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)metaumbrella: the first comprehensive suite to perform data analysis in umbrella reviews with stratification of the evidence (2023)Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions (2020)Mapping reviews, scoping reviews, and evidence and gap maps (EGMs): the same but different— the “Big Picture” review family (2023)Transparency and accountability in AI systems: safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making (2024)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,162 cited
  • 2019Meeting the review family: exploring review types and associated information retrieval requirements570 cited
  • 2004Optimal search strategies for retrieving systematic reviews from Medline: analytical survey422 cited
  • 2015Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews330 cited
  • 2005Systematic reviews need systematic searchers.257 cited
  • 2018A review of recent publication trends from top publishing countries186 cited
  • 2018Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review156 cited
  • 2016Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews108 cited
  • 2018It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks88 cited
  • 2019Librarian Co-Authored Systematic Reviews are Associated with Lower Risk of Bias Compared to Systematic Reviews with Acknowledgement of Librarians or No Participation by Librarians61 cited
  • 2019Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services41 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2023The case of the disappearing librarians: analyzing documentation of librarians’ contributions to systematic reviews15 cited
  • 2020Continuing education for systematic reviews: a prospective longitudinal assessment of a workshop for librarians14 cited
  • 2021Search is a verb: systematic review searching as invisible labor12 cited
  • 2024Benchmarking Librarian Support of Systematic Reviews in the Sciences, Humanities, and Social Sciences12 cited
  • 2022Evidence-based biomedical research in Sub-Saharan Africa: how library and information science professionals contribute to systematic reviews and meta-analyses9 cited
  • 2021International health library associations urge the ICMJE to seek information specialists as peer reviewers for knowledge synthesis publications8 cited