Business Continuity Innovation in Disruption Time: Sociotechnical Systems, Business Analytics, Virtual Business, and Mediating Role of Knowledge Absorptive Capacity

Meng Miao · Saide Saide · Silvia Ratna · Muhammad Muflih

25 citations0/0 files storedIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Innovation and Knowledge Management Big Data and Business Intelligence Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management

Abstract

The continuity strategy of business innovation to deal with the disruption condition, it is still many to be designed and explained. Referring to a sociotechnical systems (STSs) approach, this article conceptualizes and practically examines the business analytics, virtual business, and knowledge absorptive capacity that increase and produce the continuity capability of business innovation in uncertain business environment (e.g., COVID-19). We used SmartPLS to empirically evaluate the model based on 145 companies in a developing country of Indonesia that is currently under high disruption. Drawing a technical perspective, business analytics has successfully enhanced business continuity innovation and knowledge absorptive capacity. In a socio perspective, knowledge absorptive capacity significantly produces business continuity innovation. Business continuity innovation suffers if firms adopt virtual business without increasing their knowledge capabilities. Furthermore, mediating effects present higher support from management level to knowledge absorptive capacity strategy, a bigger impact for business analytics, and virtual business to improve and increase the goals opportunities of business continuity innovation. A novel contribution is the integration of STSs (business analytics, virtual business, and knowledge absorptive capacity) that drives business continuity innovation to deal and recover from uncertain environment. Our efforts also align several fields such as information technology-business alignment strategy, knowledge management, and knowledge-business services. Future research would be worthwhile and interesting whether our framework will suitable to different companies/respondents, business context, industry area, and crisis condition.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 25 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.1990Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation 2011PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet 1994A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation 1932A technique for measurement of attitudes 2009How to Write Up and Report PLS Analyses 2020Viability of intertwined supply networks: extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak 2020Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the COVID-19 pandemic

Cited by

2022The three pointers of research and development (R&D) for growth-boosting sustainable innovation system 2023ICT Team Dual-Innovations in the Microlevel of Circular Supply Chain Management: Explicit-Tacit Knowledge, Exchange Ideology, and Leadership Support 2021Strengthen the Security Management of Customer Information in the Virtual Banks of Hong Kong through Business Continuity Management to Maintain Its Business Sustainability

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.