Mental health and well‐being impacts of COVID‐19 on rural paramedics, police, community nurses and child protection workers

Russell J. Roberts · Alfred Wong · Stacey Jenkins · Alain Neher · Clare Sutton · Peter F O'Meara +3 more

82 citations0/0 files storedAustralian Journal of Rural Health

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

COVID-19 and Mental Health Occupational Health and Burnout Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the mental health and well-being of rural paramedics, police, community nursing and child protection staff. METHOD: An online survey was distributed to investigate the sources of stress and support across individual, task and organisational domains. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The survey was completed by 1542 paramedics, police, community nurses and child protection workers from all states and territories of Australia. This study describes the data for the 632 rural participants. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main measures of well-being were the Public Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), the Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD7), the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), workplace engagement, intention to quit and COVID-19-related stress. RESULTS: The mean depression and anxiety scores were 8.2 (PHQ9) and 6.8 (GAD7). This is 2-3 times that found in the general community. Over half (56.1%) of respondents showed high emotional exhaustion (burnout). The emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation and personal accomplishment mean scores were 28.5, 9.3 and 34.2, respectively. The strongest associations with burnout and psychological distress were workload, provision of practical support, training and organisational communication. A significant proportion of respondents were seriously considering quitting (27.4%) or looking for a new job with a different employer (28.5%) in the next 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has increased the workload and stress on rural front-line community staff. The major sources of stress were related to organisations' responses to COVID-19 and not COVID-19 per se. The data suggest the most effective mental health interventions are practical and preventive, such as firstly ensuring fair and reasonable workloads.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 82 citations exist upstream.

References

2013Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 2001The PHQ-9 2008Validation and Standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the General Population 1984Maslach Burnout Inventory 2002Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions.2004EMPLOYEES' GOAL ORIENTATIONS, THE QUALITY OF LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE, AND THE OUTCOMES OF JOB PERFORMANCE AND JOB SATISFACTION.2020Frontline nurses’ burnout, anxiety, depression, and fear statuses and their associated factors during the COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China: A large-scale cross-sectional study 2013Standardization of the depression screener Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in the general population

Cited by

2023Challenges to social work professionalism during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative analysis of child protective workers’ perspectives 2023The global impact of COVID-19 on child protection professionals: A scoping review and thematic analysis

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.