Exposure to interparental violence and justification of intimate partner violence among women in sexual unions in sub-Saharan Africa

Richard Gyan Aboagye, Abdul‐Aziz Seidu, Bernard Kwadwo Yeboah Asiamah-Asare, Prince Peprah, Isaac Yeboah Addo, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah

2021-09-09articleArchives of Public Health36 citationsgold

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Intimate Partner and Family Violence Elder Abuse and Neglect Gender, Violence, Rights in Latin America

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Justification of intimate partner violence (IPV) is one of the critical factors that account for the high prevalence of IPV among women. In this study, we examined the association between exposure to interparental violence and IPV justification among women in sexual unions in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). METHODS: Data for this study were obtained from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) of 26 countries in SSA conducted between 2010 and 2020. A total of 112,953 women in sexual unions were included in this study. A multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was carried out. The results of the regression analysis were presented using crude odds ratios (cOR) and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: The prevalence of interparental violence in the countries considered in this study was 23.8%, with the highest (40.8%) and lowest (4.9%) in Burundi and Comoros, respectively. IPV justification was 45.8%, with the highest and lowest prevalence in Mali (80.9%) and South Africa (4.6%) respectively. Women who were exposed to interparental violence were more likely to justify IPV compared to those who were not exposed [aOR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.47-1.59]. We found higher odds of justification of IPV among women who were exposed to interparental violence compared to those who were not exposed in all the countries, except Burkina Faso, Comoros, Gambia, and Rwanda. CONCLUSION: The findings call for several strategies for addressing interparental violence. These may include empowerment services targeting both men and women, formation of stronger social networks to improve women's self-confidence, and the provision of evidence-based information and resources at the community level. These interventions should pay critical attention to young people exposed to interparental violence. Public health education and messaging should emphasise on the negative health and social implications of interparental violence and IPV.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 36 citations exist upstream.

References

2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies

2014The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies

1973Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis

2013Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence.

2002Risk factors for domestic violence: findings from a South African cross-sectional study

2000Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: physical, sexual, and psychological battering

1999Dating violence in mid-adolescence Theory, significance, and emerging prevention initiatives

2018Lifetime Economic Burden of Intimate Partner Violence Among U.S. Adults

Cited by

2023Ending violence against women: Help-seeking behaviour of women exposed to intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan Africa

2022Socio-economic inequalities in intimate partner violence justification among women in Ghana: analysis of the 2014 Ghana Demographic and Health Survey data