SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Lag times in the publication of network meta-analyses: a survey
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Lag times in the publication of network meta-analyses: a survey (2021)Lag times in the publication of network m…Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence (2018)Time-to-update of systematic …Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons (2017)Network meta-analysis: a tech…Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer (2016)Wasted research when systemat…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…Peer review and the publication process (2016)Peer review and the publicati…On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations (2016)On the reproducibility of met…Does it take too long to publish research? (2016)Does it take too long to publ…Reporting standards for literature searches and report inclusion criteria: making research syntheses more transparent and easy to replicate (2014)Reporting standards for liter…How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)How to Read a Systematic Revi…Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication? (2013)Are systematic reviews up-to-…Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors (2012)Rising Publication Delays Inf…When and how to update systematic reviews (2008)When and how to update system…Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster (2008)Systematic reviews can be pro…Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews (2008)Surveillance search technique…How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)How Quickly Do Systematic Rev…A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews (2007)A systematic review identifie…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The association between cognitive function and subsequent depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2016)A meta-analysis of the relationship between emotion recognition ability and intelligence (2019)'Qualitative' and 'quantitative' methods and approaches across subject fields: implications for research values, assumptions, and practices (2023)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence (2009)Treatment of Internet gaming disorder: An international systematic review and CONSORT evaluation (2017)Screening and assessment tools for gaming disorder: A comprehensive systematic review (2020)Association of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders and Violence Perpetration in Adults and Adolescents From 15 Countries (2021)Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Living Systematic Reviews: An Emerging Opportunity to Narrow the Evidence-Practice Gap (2014)Systematic review automation technologies (2014)Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how (2017)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Empirical Comparison of Publication Bias Tests in Meta-Analysis (2018)When continuous outcomes are measured using different scales: guide for meta-analysis and interpretation (2019)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Bias in peer review (2012)“I don't see gender”: Conceptualizing a gendered system of academic publishing (2019)Innovative Strategies for Peer Review (2020)The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science (2024)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews? (2018)What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences (2018)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The efficacy of cognitive and behavior therapies for insomnia on daytime symptoms: A systematic review and network meta-analysis (2020)Employment Instability and Fertility in Europe: A Meta-Analysis (2021)Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors (2015)Making progress with the automation of systematic reviews: principles of the International Collaboration for the Automation of Systematic Reviews (ICASR) (2018)Compared to What? A Meta-Analysis of Batterer Intervention Studies Using Nontreated Controls or Comparisons (2019)Are Social Media Ruining Our Lives? A Review of Meta-Analytic Evidence (2019)Mapping of reporting guidance for systematic reviews and meta-analyses generated a comprehensive item bank for future reporting guidelines (2019)Parenting and Self-Control Across Early to Late Adolescence: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis (2019)Problems and challenges of predatory journals (2018)Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints (2019)Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2016The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses1,481 cited
  • 2007How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis837 cited
  • 2014How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care454 cited
  • 2017Network meta-analysis: a technique to gather evidence from direct and indirect comparisons409 cited
  • 2016Does it take too long to publish research?267 cited
  • 2016On the reproducibility of meta-analyses: six practical recommendations230 cited
  • 2013Are systematic reviews up-to-date at the time of publication?196 cited
  • 2008When and how to update systematic reviews151 cited
  • 2016Peer review and the publication process125 cited
  • 2014Reporting standards for literature searches and report inclusion criteria: making research syntheses more transparent and easy to replicate125 cited
  • 2016Wasted research when systematic reviews fail to provide a complete and up-to-date evidence synthesis: the example of lung cancer125 cited
  • 2012Rising Publication Delays Inflate Journal Impact Factors109 cited
  • 2008Systematic reviews can be produced and published faster103 cited
  • 2007A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

98 cited
  • 2008Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews84 cited
  • 2018Time-to-update of systematic reviews relative to the availability of new evidence72 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.