SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Progress and challenges of network meta‐analysis
16 references·1 citing·33 second hop
Progress and challenges of network meta‐analysis (2021)Progress and challenges of network meta‐a…CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)CINeMA: An approach for asses…The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statemen…Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)Ranking treatments in frequen…Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)Evaluating the Quality of Evi…A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)A GRADE Working Group approac…Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)Graphical Tools for Network M…Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)Indirect and mixed‐treatment …Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Evidence Synthesis for Decisi…Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies (2012)Consistency and inconsistency…Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Checking consistency in mixed…CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)CiteSpace II: Detecting and v…Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Bivariate analysis of sensiti…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Network meta‐analysis for ind…A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations (2001)A hierarchical regression app…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…Methods for meta-analysis and meta-regression of binomial data: concepts and tutorial with Stata command metapreg (2024)Methods for meta-analysis and…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (2018)GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias) (2011)Network meta-analysis: an introduction for clinicians (2016)GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence (2018)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta‐analysis (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)netmeta : An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods (2023)The Strength of Weak Ties (1973)Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
  • 2005CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature6,491 cited
  • 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
  • 2010Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis2,517 cited
  • 2013Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA2,473 cited
  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 2012Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies2,095 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 2020CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis1,923 cited
  • 2014A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis1,812 cited
  • 2015Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods1,725 cited
  • 2012Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool1,722 cited
  • 2001A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,509 cited
  • 2014Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis1,402 cited
  • 2012Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 21,206 cited
  • 2002Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons1,204 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Methods for meta-analysis and meta-regression of binomial data: concepts and tutorial with Stata command metapreg24 cited