SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Unknown Prevalence of Postrandomization Bias in 15 Physical Therapy Journals: A Methods Review
16 references·1 citing·42 second hop
The Unknown Prevalence of Postrandomization Bias in 15 Physical Therapy Journals: A Methods Review (2021)The Unknown Prevalence of Postrandomizati…Clinimetrics: Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale (2019)Clinimetrics: Physiotherapy E…PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement (2016)PRESS Peer Review of Electron…The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science (2015)The Extent and Consequences o…Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters (2014)Handbook of Inter-Rater Relia…A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples (2013)A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa…Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Measuring the Prevalence of Q…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reli…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements (2005)The Kappa Statistic in Reliab…Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)Reliability of the PEDro Scal…Bias, prevalence and kappa (1993)Bias, prevalence and kappaA power primer. (1992)A power primer.Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives (1981)Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses,…Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa. (1969)Large sample standard errors …A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)A Coefficient of Agreement fo…Is the quality of systematic reviews influenced by prospective registration: a methods review of systematic musculoskeletal physical therapy reviews (2022)Is the quality of systematic …The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Measuring agreement in method comparison studies (1999)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications (2012)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)High agreement but low Kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes (1990)Inter-Coder Agreement for Computational Linguistics (2008)Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. (2012)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The case for motivated reasoning. (1990)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science (2012)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science (2021)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study (2009)The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta‐analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review (2015)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Method agreement analysis: A review of correct methodology (2010)Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders–Fifth Edition (PCL-5) in veterans. (2015)New WHO prevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review (2001)A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. (2002)Using PLS Path Modeling for Assessing Hierarchical Construct Models: Guidelines and Empirical Illustration1 (2009)Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): Initial Reliability and Validity Data (1997)Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1992A power primer.42,571 cited
  • 1960A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales42,335 cited
  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,776 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2016PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement5,681 cited
  • 2003Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials4,799 cited
  • 2005The Kappa Statistic in Reliability Studies: Use, Interpretation, and Sample Size Requirements4,093 cited
  • 2012Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling2,240 cited
  • 2010Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed2,206 cited
  • 1993Bias, prevalence and kappa2,175 cited
  • 1981Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives1,575 cited
  • 1969Large sample standard errors of kappa and weighted kappa.1,521 cited
  • 2015The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science1,389 cited
  • 2014Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters1,097 cited
  • 2013

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples
1,021 cited
  • 2019Clinimetrics: Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) Scale974 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022Is the quality of systematic reviews influenced by prospective registration: a methods review of systematic musculoskeletal physical therapy reviews10 cited