SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Exact inference for fixed‐effects meta‐analysis of proportions
14 references·0 citing·43 second hop
Exact inference for fixed‐effects meta‐analysis of proportions (2021)Exact inference for fixed‐effects meta‐an…Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta‐analysis of single proportions (2019)Seriously misleading results …Exact inference for the random‐effect model for meta‐analyses with rare events (2019)Exact inference for the rando…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…A Re-Evaluation of Fixed Effect(s) Meta-Analysis (2017)A Re-Evaluation of Fixed Effe…Meta-Analysis Framework for Exact Inferences with Application to the Analysis of Rare Events (2016)Meta-Analysis Framework for E…Meta-analysis of Proportions of Rare Events–A Comparison of Exact Likelihood Methods with Robust Variance Estimation (2014)Meta-analysis of Proportions …Exact Meta-Analysis Approach for Discrete Data and its Application to 2 × 2 Tables With Rare Events (2014)Exact Meta-Analysis Approach …Simulation-Based Comparison of Methods for Meta-Analysis of Proportions and Rates (2013)Simulation-Based Comparison o…Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R…Analyzing effect sizes: Fixed-effects models (2009)Analyzing effect sizes: Fixed…Exact and efficient inference procedure for meta-analysis and its application to the analysis of independent 2 x 2 tables with all available data but without artificial continuity correction (2008)Exact and efficient inference…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008)A Re-Evaluation of Random-Eff…Inter‐study differences: How should they influence the interpretation and analysis of results? (1987)Inter‐study differences: How …Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Meta-analysis: Principles and procedures (1997)What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data (2004)Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare events (2006)Meta-analysis for rare events (2010)Suicide Risk and Sexual Orientation: A Critical Review (2013)Network meta‐analysis of rare events using the Mantel‐Haenszel method (2019)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Chapter 9: Analysing Data and Undertaking Meta-Analyses (2008)Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (2011)Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses (2019)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Real-world Performance of Meta-analysis Methods for Double-Zero-Event Studies with Dichotomous Outcomes Using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2019)Exclusion of studies with no events in both arms in meta-analysis impacted the conclusions (2020)Utilization of the evidence from studies with no events in meta-analyses of adverse events: an empirical investigation (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Methods for evidence synthesis in the case of very few studies (2018)Meta‐analysis of the difference of medians (2019)A historical review of publication bias (2020)A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis (2010)Meta-analysis of prevalence (2013)Methods to estimate the between‐study variance and its uncertainty in meta‐analysis (2015)Arcsine‐based transformations for meta‐analysis of proportions: Pros, cons, and alternatives (2020)How are systematic reviews of prevalence conducted? A methodological study (2020)Suicide, self-harm and suicidal ideation during COVID-19: A systematic review (2021)Meta‐analyses in systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials in perinatal medicine: comparison of fixed and random effects models (2001)Manifestations and Management of Chronic Insomnia in Adults: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment, Number 125 (2005)Mentoring programs to affect delinquency and associated outcomes of youth at risk: A comprehensive meta-analytic review (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)How to perform a meta-analysis with R: a practical tutorial (2019)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Racial Discrimination and Asian Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis (2011)Some recommended statistical analytic practices when reliability generalization studies are conducted (2012)The Benefits of Following Your Pride: Authentic Pride Promotes Achievement (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2010Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package20,412 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2008A Re-Evaluation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis2,562 cited
  • 2019Seriously misleading results using inverse of Freeman‐Tukey double arcsine transformation in meta‐analysis of single proportions622 cited
  • 2017A Re-Evaluation of Fixed Effect(s) Meta-Analysis287 cited
  • 2008Exact and efficient inference procedure for meta-analysis and its application to the analysis of independent 2 x 2 tables with all available data but without artificial continuity correction119 cited
  • 1987Inter‐study differences: How should they influence the interpretation and analysis of results?108 cited
  • 2014Exact Meta-Analysis Approach for Discrete Data and its Application to 2 × 2 Tables With Rare Events75 cited
  • 2009Analyzing effect sizes: Fixed-effects models56 cited
  • 2013Simulation-Based Comparison of Methods for Meta-Analysis of Proportions and Rates55 cited
  • 2014Meta-analysis of Proportions of Rare Events–A Comparison of Exact Likelihood Methods with Robust Variance Estimation36 cited
  • 2016Meta-Analysis Framework for Exact Inferences with Application to the Analysis of Rare Events27 cited
  • 2019Exact inference for the random‐effect model for meta‐analyses with rare events

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

18 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.