SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials related to implant dentistry
16 references·0 citing·47 second hop
Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials related to implant dentistry (2021)Reporting quality of abstracts of randomi…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014 (2016)Update on the endorsement of …Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis (2016)Reporting quality of randomis…Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production in implantology (2009–2013) (2016)Bibliometric analysis of the …Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: A systematic review (2014)Improvement in the quality of…Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 2011 (2012)Reporting quality of abstract…A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)A catalogue of reporting guid…The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals (2008)The quality of reporting of t…CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts (2008)CONSORT for reporting randomi…Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Impact factor: a valid measur…Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions (2002)Hierarchy of evidence: a fram…Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials (2001)Use of the CONSORT Statement …The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1998)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the Quality of Repo…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials (2008)Research Review: Recommendations for reporting on treatment trials for child and adolescent anxiety disorders – an international consensus statement (2020)CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Viewing systematic reviews and meta-analysis in social research through different lenses (2014)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (2006)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Revised STandards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): Extending the CONSORT Statement (2010)Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial (2014)Reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomised trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement with explanation and elaboration (2018)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Estudos de revisão sistemática: um guia para síntese criteriosa da evidência científica (2007)11 Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge Through Syntheses (2008)Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies (2016)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
  • 2009A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research1,047 cited
  • 2001Use of the CONSORT Statement and Quality of Reports of Randomized Trials1,026 cited
  • 2002Hierarchy of evidence: a framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions993 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
  • 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts460 cited
  • 1998Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement177 cited
  • 2016Update on the endorsement of CONSORT by high impact factor journals: a survey of journal “Instructions to Authors” in 2014167 cited
  • 2008The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals133 cited
  • 2014Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: A systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

77 cited
  • 2016Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production in implantology (2009–2013)75 cited
  • 2012Reporting quality of abstracts of randomized controlled trials published in leading orthodontic journals from 2006 to 201171 cited
  • 2016Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis65 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.