SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil
16 references·0 citing·41 second hop
Research integrity guidelines and safeguards in Brazil (2021)Research integrity guidelines and safegua…Research integrity codes of conduct in Europe: Understanding the divergences (2021)Research integrity codes of c…Should research misconduct be criminalized? (2020)Should research misconduct be…International collaboration in Brazilian science: financing and impact (2020)International collaboration i…COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science” (2020)COVID-19 research: pandemic v…Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions (2019)Quality of reports of investi…Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement (2018)Working with Research Integri…Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility (2018)Institutional Research Miscon…FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH (2017)FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEAR…European Universities’ Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct (2017)European Universities’ Guidan…Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity (2015)Misconduct Policies, Academic…Brazilian Science and Research Integrity: Where are We? What Next? (2015)Brazilian Science and Researc…An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies (2015)An International Study of Res…Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications (2014)Financial costs and personal …Guidance on research integrity: no union in Europe (2013)Guidance on research integrit…A European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity (2010)A European Code of Conduct fo…Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files (2007)Causal Factors Implicated in …Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative evaluation and research methods (1990)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Perspective (2012)Data fraud in clinical trials (2015)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature (2018)Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication (2018)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset (2020)COVID-19 and hospitality and tourism research: An integrative review (2021)Research Integrity: Where We Are and Where We Are Heading (2023)Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams (2003)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Profiles not metrics: the case of Brazilian universities (2021)Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação no Brasil: duas faces da mesma moeda? (2022)Measuring and characterizing international collaboration patterns in Indian scientific research (2023)Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries (2011)Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science (2013)Meta-assessment of bias in science (2017)Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? (2018)Authorship, plagiarism and conflict of interest: views and practices from low/middle-income country health researchers (2017)Towards a taxonomy of research misconduct: The case of business school research (2018)Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance (2014)Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of ‘Scientific Integrity’ (2016)Educating PhD Students in Research Integrity in Europe (2021)What Research Institutions Can Do to Foster Research Integrity (2020)Strengthening research integrity: which topic areas should organisations focus on? (2021)Scientific misbehavior in economics (2014)Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010A European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity511 cited
  • 2015Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity267 cited
  • 2014Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications189 cited
  • 2015An International Study of Research Misconduct Policies185 cited
  • 2007Causal Factors Implicated in Research Misconduct: Evidence from ORI Case Files144 cited
  • 2017FOSTERING INTEGRITY IN RESEARCH135 cited
  • 2020COVID-19 research: pandemic versus “paperdemic”, integrity, values and risks of the “speed science”130 cited
  • 2018Working with Research Integrity—Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement98 cited
  • 2013Guidance on research integrity: no union in Europe83 cited
  • 2020International collaboration in Brazilian science: financing and impact80 cited
  • 2020Should research misconduct be criminalized?79 cited
  • 2018Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility64 cited
  • 2021Research integrity codes of conduct in Europe: Understanding the divergences61 cited
  • 2017European Universities’ Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct44 cited
  • 2019

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions
42 cited
  • 2015Brazilian Science and Research Integrity: Where are We? What Next?27 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.