Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Impact of False Investigators on Grant Funding

16 references·2 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,282 cited
2016Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition708 cited
2007The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships384 cited
2010Metrics: Do metrics matter?290 cited
2019Comparison of National Institutes of Health Grant Amounts to First-Time Male and Female Principal Investigators284 cited
2017Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research205 cited
2014Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications189 cited
2013Whither research integrity? Plagiarism, self-plagiarism and coercive citation in an age of research assessment171 cited
2010The Costs and Underappreciated Consequences of Research Misconduct: A Case Study93 cited
2012Ending Honorary Authorship75 cited
2015To Apply or Not to Apply: A Survey Analysis of Grant Writing Costs and Benefits74 cited
2018Testing Hypotheses on Risk Factors for Scientific Misconduct via Matched-Control Analysis of Papers Containing Problematic Image Duplications65 cited
2019The influence of editorial decisions and the academic network on self-citations and journal impact factors52 cited
2016Honorary authorship and symbolic violence

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

42 cited

2011Peer Review, Program Officers and Science Funding35 cited

2011Patents, Material Transfers, and Access to Research Inputs in Biomedical Research21 cited

Cited by

2023Research Misconduct Investigations in China’s Science Funding System13 cited
2024The Conceptual ‘APC Ring’: Is There a Risk of APC-Driven Guest Authorship, and Is a Change in the Culture of the APC Needed?5 cited