Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

An approach to quantifying the potential importance of residual confounding in systematic reviews of observational studies: A GRADE concept paper

5 references·2 citing·22 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2001Sick individuals and sick populations3,735 cited
2018Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes1,337 cited
2011GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence1,335 cited
2018GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence907 cited
2017The GRADE Working Group clarifies the construct of certainty of evidence847 cited

Cited by

2023GRADE GUIDANCE 38: Updated guidance for rating up certainty of evidence due to a dose-response gradient32 cited
2021How to report E-values for meta-analyses: Recommended improvements and additions to the new GRADE approach10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work