SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Scoping Review of Text-Matching Software Used for Student Academic Integrity in Higher Education
16 references·3 citing·48 second hop
A Scoping Review of Text-Matching Software Used for Student Academic Integrity in Higher Education (2021)A Scoping Review of Text-Matching Softwar…PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…Plagiarism in Higher Education (2021)Plagiarism in Higher EducationPRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and e…JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis (2020)JBI Manual for Evidence Synth…Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (2019)Systematic Reviews in Educati…Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct A Systematic Review (2019)Plagiarism and Academic Misco…Academic Plagiarism Detection (2019)Academic Plagiarism DetectionSystematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …Is plagiarism changing over time? A 10-year time-lag study with three points of measurement (2016)Is plagiarism changing over t…Academic integrity: a review of the literature (2012)Academic integrity: a review …Does the adoption of plagiarism-detection software in higher education reduce plagiarism? (2011)Does the adoption of plagiari…Turning to Turnitin to Fight Plagiarism among University Students (2010)Turning to Turnitin to Fight …Plagiarism in the Internet Age. (2009)Plagiarism in the Internet Ag…Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do (2009)Measuring plagiarism: researc…Formative feedback within plagiarism education: Is there a role for text-matching software? (2009)Formative feedback within pla…Turnitin® (2007)Turnitin®Challenging cheating in higher education: a review of research and practice (2024)Challenging cheating in highe…A Bibliometric Analysis on Academic Integrity (2024)A Bibliometric Analysis on Ac…The Academic Integrity Technological Arms Race and its Impact on Learning, Teaching, and Assessment (2023)The Academic Integrity Techno…Chronicle of Higher Education (1996)Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment (1997)In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons (2003)‘Teach us how to do it properly!’ An Australian academic integrity student survey (2013)Predictors of Academic Dishonesty among undergraduate students in online and face-to-face courses (2018)Reducing plagiarism through academic misconduct education (2020)Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness (1976)Journal of Business Ethics (2017)Academic Misconduct, Misrepresentation and Gaming: A Reassessment (2018)Integrity: What it is and Why it is Important (2018)Mapping the landscape of academic integrity education programs: what approaches are effective? (2019)Tools for Teaching (1993)Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (1999)Entertainment-Education and Social Change (2003)Why do postgraduate students commit plagiarism? An empirical study (2018)A systematic review of academic dishonesty in online learning environments (2022)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews (2004)Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the-state-of-the-art (2012)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Testing of Support Tools for Plagiarism Detection (2019)What are Automated Paraphrasing Tools and how do we address them? A review of a growing threat to academic integrity (2022)Evaluating the authenticity of ChatGPT responses: a study on text-matching capabilities (2023)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Using Q methodology: Sorting out subjectivity in educational research (2020)Critical thinking in the preschool classroom - A systematic literature review (2022)The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis (2023)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review (2022)The state of evidence for social and emotional learning: A contemporary meta-analysis of universal school-based SEL interventions (2023)Delphi studies in social and health sciences—Recommendations for an interdisciplinary standardized reporting (DELPHISTAR). Results of a Delphi study (2024)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)Strategies to improve response rates to web surveys: A literature review (2021)Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Reports (2022)New priorities for academic integrity: equity, diversity, inclusion, decolonization and Indigenization (2022)Postplagiarism: transdisciplinary ethics and integrity in the age of artificial intelligence and neurotechnology (2023)Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence: An Overview (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews11,660 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2020JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis4,162 cited
  • 2020PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews916 cited
  • 2019Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application599 cited
  • 2012Academic integrity: a review of the literature357 cited
  • 2019Academic Plagiarism Detection237 cited
  • 2009Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do236 cited
  • 2021Plagiarism in Higher Education199 cited
  • 2010Turning to Turnitin to Fight Plagiarism among University Students182 cited
  • 2016Is plagiarism changing over time? A 10-year time-lag study with three points of measurement119 cited
  • 2011Does the adoption of plagiarism-detection software in higher education reduce plagiarism?115 cited
  • 2009Formative feedback within plagiarism education: Is there a role for text-matching software?113 cited
  • 2009Plagiarism in the Internet Age.111 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2019
Plagiarism and Academic Misconduct A Systematic Review
104 cited
  • 2007Turnitin®101 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024A Bibliometric Analysis on Academic Integrity22 cited
    • 2023The Academic Integrity Technological Arms Race and its Impact on Learning, Teaching, and Assessment19 cited
    • 2024Challenging cheating in higher education: a review of research and practice19 cited