SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
THE STRUCTURE FORMAT OF ABSTRACTS: A SURVEY OF LEADING DENTAL JOURNALS AND THEIR EDITORS
16 references·2 citing·39 second hop
THE STRUCTURE FORMAT OF ABSTRACTS: A SURVEY OF LEADING DENTAL JOURNALS AND THEIR EDITORS (2021)THE STRUCTURE FORMAT OF ABSTRACTS: A SURV…Remarkable Growth of Open Access in the Biomedical Field: Analysis of PubMed Articles from 2006 to 2010 (2013)Remarkable Growth of Open Acc…Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals (2012)Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged…Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Transparent and accurate repo…The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for repo…Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence' (2009)Extending an evidence hierarc…Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors' (2008)Endorsement of the CONSORT St…CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)CONSORT for Reporting Randomi…Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract. (2005)Adoption of structured abstra…Current findings from research on structured abstracts. (2004)Current findings from researc…Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association. (1994)Quality of nonstructured and …New Information for Authors — And Readers (1990)New Information for Authors —…More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)More Informative Abstracts Re…A Proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Review Articles (1988)A Proposal for More Informati…Structured Abstracts for Papers Reporting Clinical Trials (1987)Structured Abstracts for Pape…A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature. (1987)A proposal for more informati…A Proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Clinical Articles (1987)A Proposal for More Informati…Enhancing the quality of reporting of orthodontic clinical research (2024)Enhancing the quality of repo…“Spin” among abstracts of randomized controlled trials in sleep medicine: a research-on-research study (2023)“Spin” among abstracts of ran…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2008)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts (2013)The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The CARE Guidelines: Consensus-based Clinical Case Report Guideline Development (2013)Ítems de referencia para publicar Protocolos de Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: Declaración PRISMA-P 2015 (2016)Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research (2019)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Rapid evidence assessment: increasing the transparency of an emerging methodology (2015)Establishing and Governing e-Mental Health Care in Australia: A Systematic Review of Challenges and A Call For Policy-Focussed Research (2016)Learning styles of physiotherapists: a systematic scoping review (2019)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension (2020)A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) (2021)A declaração PRISMA 2020: diretriz atualizada para relatar revisões sistemáticas (2022)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review (2014)Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews (2014)Defining and Measuring Meditation-Related Adverse Effects in Mindfulness-Based Programs (2021)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1998)A general critical appraisal tool: An evaluation of construct validity (2011)Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making (2005)STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration17,627 cited
  • 2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
  • 2010Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network589 cited
  • 1990More Informative Abstracts Revisited524 cited
  • 2009Extending an evidence hierarchy to include topics other than treatment: revising the Australian 'levels of evidence'435 cited
  • 2008Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'241 cited
  • 1987A proposal for more informative abstracts of clinical articles. Ad Hoc Working Group for Critical Appraisal of the Medical Literature.240 cited
  • 1987A Proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Clinical Articles233 cited
  • 1994Quality of nonstructured and structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association.203 cited
  • 2012Are Peer Reviewers Encouraged to Use Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of 116 Health Research Journals200 cited
  • 2004Current findings from research on structured abstracts.120 cited
  • 1987Structured Abstracts for Papers Reporting Clinical Trials104 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1988
A Proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Review Articles
103 cited
  • 2005Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract.93 cited
  • 1990New Information for Authors — And Readers71 cited
  • 2013Remarkable Growth of Open Access in the Biomedical Field: Analysis of PubMed Articles from 2006 to 201066 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Enhancing the quality of reporting of orthodontic clinical research8 cited
    • 2023“Spin” among abstracts of randomized controlled trials in sleep medicine: a research-on-research study8 cited