SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Shared burden is always lighter – Peer‐review performance in an ophthalmological journal 2010–2020
12 references·0 citing·46 second hop
Shared burden is always lighter – Peer‐review performance in an ophthalmological journal 2010–2020 (2021)Shared burden is always lighter – Peer‐re…The influence of the global COVID‐19 pandemic on manuscript submissions and editor and reviewer performance at six ecology journals (2021)The influence of the global C…Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi‐stakeholder perspective on causes and effects (2021)Overburdening of peer reviewe…Success factors of academic journals in the digital age (2020)Success factors of academic j…How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts (2020)How a torrent of COVID scienc…The state of the art in peer review (2018)The state of the art in peer …Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution (2017)Recruitment of reviewers is b…Language and socioeconomics predict geographic variation in peer review outcomes at an ecology journal (2017)Language and socioeconomics p…The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise (2016)The Global Burden of Journal …Peer review: Troubled from the start (2016)Peer review: Troubled from th…Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars Decline to Review their Peers’ Work (2015)Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholar…The Peer-review Process: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly, and the Extraordinary (2014)The Peer-review Process: The …Scientific peer review (2011)Scientific peer reviewThe Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1960)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Handbook of organizational change and innovation (2005)How Much Better Are the Most-Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication (2005)Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 Project (2012)Reflections on the so-called value-free ideal (2016)Uma Análise Comparativa dos Fatores de Rejeição nos Periódicos de Diferentes Estratos de Administração (2016)A framework for assessing the peer review duration of journals: case study in computer science (2020)The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations (2013)We need to talk about peer-review—Experienced reviewers are not endangered species, but they need motivation (2020)The crisis of peer review: Part of the evolution of science (2024)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Peer review in a changing world: An international study measuring the attitudes of researchers (2012)The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (2015)Meta-research: Why research on research matters (2018)On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective (2019)Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)Editor and reviewer gender influence the peer review process but not peer review outcomes at an ecology journal (2015)Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution (2019)Improving equity, diversity, and inclusion in academia (2022)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review (2019)AI-assisted peer review (2021)COVID‐19 and the gender gap in work hours (2020)The Impact of COVID-19 on Gender Equality (2020)Unequal effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on scientists (2020)Trade-off between urgency and reduced editorial capacity affect publication speed in ecological and medical journals during 2020 (2021)Scientific authorship by gender: trends before and during a global pandemic (2022)The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the gender gap in research productivity within academia (2023)A Practical Guide to Focus-Group Research (2006)Achieving Saturation in Thematic Analysis: Development and Refinement of a Codebook (2014)Global patterns in the publishing of academic knowledge: Global North, global South (2016)Innovating peer review, reconfiguring scholarly communication: an analytical overview of ongoing peer review innovation activities (2022)Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (2022)THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE PREHISTORY OF PEER REVIEW, 1665–1965 (2017)Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature (2020)Survey Fatigue During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Analysis of Neurosurgery Survey Response Rates (2021)Mental disorders following COVID-19 and other epidemics: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011Scientific peer review563 cited
  • 2020How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing — in seven charts387 cited
  • 2016The Global Burden of Journal Peer Review in the Biomedical Literature: Strong Imbalance in the Collective Enterprise246 cited
  • 2016Peer review: Troubled from the start173 cited
  • 2018The state of the art in peer review171 cited
  • 2017Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution109 cited
  • 2015Reviewer Fatigue? Why Scholars Decline to Review their Peers’ Work89 cited
  • 2021Overburdening of peer reviewers: A multi‐stakeholder perspective on causes and effects73 cited
  • 2021The influence of the global COVID‐19 pandemic on manuscript submissions and editor and reviewer performance at six ecology journals37 cited
  • 2014The Peer-review Process: The Good, the Bad, the Ugly, and the Extraordinary21 cited
  • 2020Success factors of academic journals in the digital age21 cited
  • 2017Language and socioeconomics predict geographic variation in peer review outcomes at an ecology journal18 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work