SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Philosophy of Scientific Malpractice
16 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Philosophy of Scientific Malpractice (2021)Philosophy of Scientific MalpracticePrevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands (2022)Prevalence of questionable re…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Why Has the Number of Scienti…Systematicity (2013)SystematicityResponsible Conduct of Research (2009)Responsible Conduct of Resear…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)How Many Scientists Fabricate…Trading zones and interactional expertise (2007)Trading zones and interaction…Rethinking Expertise (2007)Rethinking ExpertiseRethinking Expertise (2007)Rethinking ExpertiseNormal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research (2006)Normal Misbehavior: Scientist…Scientists behaving badly (2005)Scientists behaving badlyExperts: Which Ones Should You Trust? (2001)Experts: Which Ones Should Yo…The Advancement of Science (1995)The Advancement of ScienceThe Role of Trust in Knowledge (1991)The Role of Trust in KnowledgeEpistemic Dependence (1985)Epistemic DependenceBetrayers of the Truth (1982)Betrayers of the TruthThe Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Practical Meta-Analysis (2000)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts (1986)Content Preservation (1993)Knowledge in a Social World (1999)Testimony and Epistemic Autonomy (2006)Peer Disagreement and Higher‐Order Evidence (2010)Rationality: a social-epistemology perspective (2014)The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. (1956)The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I (1964)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Where's the evidence that active learning works? (2006)STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania (2009)ECHO CHAMBERS AND EPISTEMIC BUBBLES (2018)Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication (2019)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment (1999)Epistemic Injustice (2007)Theory and language of climate change communication (2009)Bringing values and deliberation to science communication (2013)For a Sociology of Expertise: The Social Origins of the Autism Epidemic (2013)The Price of Truth (2007)Scientific Research and the Public Trust (2010)Ethics in Qualitative Research: A View of the Participants' and Researchers' World from a Critical Standpoint (2012)Democracy and Expertise (2009)Three Educational Scenarios for the Future: lessons from the sociology of knowledge (2010)Why we don’t deserve credit for everything we know (2006)Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2009How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data1,909 cited
  • 2007Rethinking Expertise1,501 cited
  • 2005Scientists behaving badly1,089 cited
  • 1985Epistemic Dependence924 cited
  • 2001Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?910 cited
  • 2007Rethinking Expertise885 cited
  • 1991The Role of Trust in Knowledge882 cited
  • 1995The Advancement of Science780 cited
  • 2009Responsible Conduct of Research416 cited
  • 2013Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?415 cited
  • 2007Trading zones and interactional expertise392 cited
  • 2022Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands292 cited
  • 2006Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research254 cited
  • 2013Systematicity253 cited
  • 1982Betrayers of the Truth239 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.