SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The case for the Humanities Citation Index (HuCI): a citation index by the humanities, for the humanities
16 references·0 citing·38 second hop
The case for the Humanities Citation Index (HuCI): a citation index by the humanities, for the humanities (2022)The case for the Humanities Citation Inde…Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic (2021)Large-scale comparison of bib…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations (2020)Google Scholar, Microsoft Aca…Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries (2018)Publication patterns in the s…Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references standardization (2016)Introducing CitedReferencesEx…A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)A review of the literature on…Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison (2015)Google Scholar, Scopus and th…Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Man…Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping (2009)Software survey: VOSviewer, a…Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective (2008)Characteristics of research o…Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review (2006)Bibliometric monitoring of re…Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization (2004)Searching for intellectual tu…Modeling the information‐seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited (2003)Modeling the information‐seek…The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences (1999)The difficulty of achieving f…The Footnote: A Curious History (1998)The Footnote: A Curious Histo…HUMANITIES SCHOLARS: INFORMATION NEEDS AND USES (1982)HUMANITIES SCHOLARS: INFORMAT…Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Colonial archives and the arts of governance (2002)Too much to know: managing scholarly information before the modern age (2011)Research Strategies for Organizational History: A Dialogue Between Historical Theory and Organization Theory (2013)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? (2015)Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature (2017)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Citation Indexing-Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (1980)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Comparing alternatives to the Web of Science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature (2007)A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator (2010)Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective (2013)CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2005)Visualizing Bibliometric Networks (2014)bibliometrix : An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis (2017)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field (2010)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: A systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories (2018)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies (2020)Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching (2022)Exploratory Bibliometrics: Using VOSviewer as a Preliminary Research Tool (2023)The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis (2015)A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis (2021)Growth rates of modern science: a latent piecewise growth curve approach to model publication numbers from established and new literature databases (2021)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge (2007)Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time (2023)A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping21,418 cited
  • 2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics2,816 cited
  • 2004Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization2,783 cited
  • 2015Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison1,783 cited
  • 2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicators1,344 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations1,016 cited
  • 2020Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations916 cited
  • 2021Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic864 cited
  • 2006Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review786 cited
  • 1998The Footnote: A Curious History611 cited
  • 1999The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences389 cited
  • 2003Modeling the information‐seeking behavior of social scientists: Ellis's study revisited349 cited
  • 2018Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

273 cited
  • 1982HUMANITIES SCHOLARS: INFORMATION NEEDS AND USES228 cited
  • 2008Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: From a research evaluation perspective191 cited
  • 2016Introducing CitedReferencesExplorer (CRExplorer): A program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references standardization137 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.