SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Eco-Innovation Diversity in a Circular Economy: Towards Circular Innovation Studies
16 references·3 citing·44 second hop
Eco-Innovation Diversity in a Circular Economy: Towards Circular Innovation Studies (2021)Eco-Innovation Diversity in a Circular Ec…A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)A tale of two databases: the …Sustainable business model innovation: A review (2018)Sustainable business model in…The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options (2017)The circular economy: New or …How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review (2017)How do scholars approach the …Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions (2017)Conceptualizing the circular …Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations (2017)Circular Economy: The Concept…Circular economy – From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools (2017)Circular economy – From revie…The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? (2016)The Circular Economy – A new …A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)A Comparison between Two Main…Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda (2012)Business models for sustainab…Producing a systematic review. (2009)Producing a systematic review.Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources (2007)Determinants of environmental…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan (2006)The Influence of Green Innova…Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Towards a Methodology for Dev…Regulatory push-pull and technological knowledge dynamics of circular economy innovation (2023)Regulatory push-pull and tech…Micro is beautiful. Adoption of eco‐innovations in micro‐firms (2023)Micro is beautiful. Adoption …Circular Economy Business Models: The Complementarities with Sharing Economy and Eco-Innovations Investments (2021)Circular Economy Business Mod…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs (1979)Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage (1991)Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage (2004)The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image – Green Core Competence (2007)The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust (2009)Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management (2019)From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management (2008)Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation (2009)Business Model Generation : A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers (2010)Designing the Business Models for Circular Economy—Towards the Conceptual Framework (2016)A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research (2017)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Women are credited less in science than men (2022)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty (2003)Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization (2014)Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines (2019)How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines (2021)Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. (1998)Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business (1999)The qualitative content analysis process (2008)Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU) (2018)The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields (1983)The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (2004)Product services for a resource-efficient and circular economy – a review (2013)Circular economy as an essentially contested concept (2017)The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. (1967)Targets for a circular economy (2019)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies (2016)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints (2020)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2003Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review15,354 cited
  • 2016The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm?9,318 cited
  • 2017Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions8,518 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 2017Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations3,950 cited
  • 2006The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan2,533 cited
  • 2012Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda2,467 cited
  • 2009Producing a systematic review.2,063 cited
  • 2013A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases1,930 cited
  • 2017The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options1,903 cited
  • 2007Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources1,783 cited
  • 2018Sustainable business model innovation: A review1,639 cited
  • 2020A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,554 cited
  • 2017Circular economy – From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools1,412 cited
  • 2017How do scholars approach the circular economy? A systematic literature review1,365 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2021Circular Economy Business Models: The Complementarities with Sharing Economy and Eco-Innovations Investments64 cited
    • 2023Micro is beautiful. Adoption of eco‐innovations in micro‐firms19 cited
    • 2023Regulatory push-pull and technological knowledge dynamics of circular economy innovation15 cited