SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A review of trauma and orthopaedic randomised clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals
7 references·0 citing·27 second hop
A review of trauma and orthopaedic randomised clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals (2021)A review of trauma and orthopaedic random…An Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery (2020)An Assessment of Randomized C…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Poor quality patient reported outcome measures bias effect estimates in orthopaedic randomized studies (2019)Poor quality patient reported…Overview of randomised controlled trials in orthopaedic research: search for significant findings (2019)Overview of randomised contro…The Robustness of Trials That Guide Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Surgery (2018)The Robustness of Trials That…Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials? (2006)Does a "Level I Evidence" rat…The Delphi List (1998)The Delphi ListThe Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals (2013)Randomized controlled trials and neurosurgery: the ideal fit or should alternative methodologies be considered? (2015)Psychosocial interventions on psychological outcomes of parents with perinatal loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2021)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Quality of Prospective Controlled Randomized Trials (2007)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Fragility of Statistically Significant Findings From Randomized Trials in Sports Surgery: A Systematic Survey (2016)The fragility of findings of randomized controlled trials in shoulder and elbow surgery (2019)The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Cartilage Restoration of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2021)The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Patellofemoral Instability Research: A Systematic Review (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Scale Development : Theory and Applications (1991)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales (1960)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 1998The Delphi List2,379 cited
  • 2006Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?99 cited
  • 2018The Robustness of Trials That Guide Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Surgery74 cited
  • 2019Poor quality patient reported outcome measures bias effect estimates in orthopaedic randomized studies26 cited
  • 2020An Assessment of Randomized Controlled Trial Quality in The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery26 cited
  • 2019Overview of randomised controlled trials in orthopaedic research: search for significant findings17 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work