SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Entrepreneurship Studies in The Sultanate of Oman: A Scoping Review of 20 years publications
16 references·0 citing·21 second hop
Entrepreneurship Studies in The Sultanate of Oman: A Scoping Review of 20 years publications (2021)Entrepreneurship Studies in The Sultanate…Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2020)Updated methodological guidan…Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension (2020)Reporting scoping reviews—PRI…Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions (2020)Nudging toward diversity in t…Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions (2020)Conducting high quality scopi…A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers (2020)A tale of two databases: the …Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods (2019)Practical Guidance for Knowle…Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach (2018)Systematic review or scoping …PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping …Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis (2017)Web of Science use in publish…A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews (2016)A scoping review on the condu…Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews (2015)Guidance for conducting syste…Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting (2014)Scoping reviews: time for cla…A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)A scoping review of scoping r…A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases (2013)A Comparison between Two Main…Scoping studies: advancing the methodology (2010)Scoping studies: advancing th…Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Scoping studies: towards a me…Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines (2019)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews (2021)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases (2018)The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis (2021)Women are credited less in science than men (2022)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols (2022)Recommendations for the extraction, analysis, and presentation of results in scoping reviews (2022)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)What is an evidence map? A systematic review of published evidence maps and their definitions, methods, and products (2016)Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2018PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation43,318 cited
  • 2005Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework36,603 cited
  • 2010Scoping studies: advancing the methodology15,226 cited
  • 2018Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach11,351 cited
  • 2020Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews7,715 cited
  • 2015Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews7,457 cited
  • 2014A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency3,074 cited
  • 2014Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting2,780 cited
  • 2016A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews2,242 cited
  • 2013A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases1,930 cited
  • 2020A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers1,554 cited
  • 2017Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis738 cited
  • 2020Reporting scoping reviews—PRISMA ScR extension492 cited
  • 2019Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods373 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2020Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions323 cited
  • 2020Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions305 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.