SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
investigadores junior españoles y su implicación en la ciencia abierta
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
investigadores junior españoles y su implicación en la ciencia abierta (2021)investigadores junior españoles y su impl…Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review (2020)Discipline-specific open acce…A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers (2020)A global questionnaire survey…So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change? (2019)So, are early career research…Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article (2019)Releasing a preprint is assoc…The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles (2018)The state of OA: a large-scal…Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition (2018)Open Science now: A systemati…Digital open science—Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research (2018)Digital open science—Teaching…Factors that affect scientists' knowledge sharing behavior in health and life sciences research communities: Differences between explicit and implicit knowledge (2017)Factors that affect scientist…Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change (2017)Early career researchers: Sch…Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices (2017)Early career researchers and …How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research (2016)How Does One “Open” Science? …How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice (2016)How Do Scientists Define Open…Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms (2015)Scholarly reputation in the d…Promoting an open research culture (2015)Promoting an open research cu…New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation (2015)New ways of building, showcas…Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines (1991)Academic Tribes and Territori…Little Science, Big Science (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. (1973)Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education (2005)Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework (2009)Developing undergraduate research and inquiry (2010)Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science (1997)The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery (2009)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Sticks and carrots: encouraging open science at its source (2015)A strategic alignment framework for the entrepreneurial university (2021)Biosecurity in an age of open science (2022)The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (1974)The Invisible Technician (1989)The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. (1992)Locating ethics in data science: responsibility and accountability in global and distributed knowledge production systems (2016)Facts, power and global evidence: a new empire of truth (2018)The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes (2023)Social media use in the research workflow (2011)Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey (2012)Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit (2015)Peer review: The experience and views of early career researchers (2017)Factors influencing researchers’ journal selection decisions (2020)Toward a new economics of science (1994)Open innovation : researching a new paradigm (2006)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review (2020)The Future of Sensitivity Analysis: An essential discipline for systems modeling and policy support (2020)The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach (2020)The social shaping of technology (1996)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Drivers and Obstacles of Open Access Publishing. A Qualitative Investigation of Individual and Institutional Factors (2020)Toward Open Research: A Narrative Review of the Challenges and Opportunities for Open Humanities (2021)Geographical and disciplinary coverage of open access journals: OpenAlex, Scopus, and WoS (2025)Peer review: still king in the digital age (2014)Social Research Methods (2016)Digital Technology and the Practices of Humanities Research (2019)Early career researchers and their authorship and peer review beliefs and practices: An international study (2019)The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method for random effects meta-analysis is straightforward and considerably outperforms the standard DerSimonian-Laird method (2014)Meta-Analysis with R (2015)quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data (2018)Preprints and Scholarly Communication: An Exploratory Qualitative Study of Adoption, Practices, Drivers and Barriers (2019)Characteristics of academic publications, preprints, and registered clinical trials on the COVID-19 pandemic (2020)Rise of the Rxivs: How Preprint Servers are Changing the Publishing Process (2020)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure (2018)The evaluation of scholarship in academic promotion and tenure processes: Past, present, and future (2018)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1991Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines2,729 cited
  • 2015Promoting an open research culture2,686 cited
  • 2018The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles1,217 cited
  • 2018Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition709 cited
  • 2017Early career researchers and their publishing and authorship practices189 cited
  • 2019Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article186 cited
  • 2016How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research127 cited
  • 2016How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice121 cited
  • 2020Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review99 cited
  • 2019So, are early career researchers the harbingers of change?94 cited
  • 2015Scholarly reputation in the digital age and the role of emerging platforms and mechanisms93 cited
  • 2017Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change82 cited
  • 2018Digital open science—Teaching digital tools for reproducible and transparent research80 cited
  • 2017Factors that affect scientists' knowledge sharing behavior in health and life sciences research communities: Differences between explicit and implicit knowledge

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

80 cited
  • 2015New ways of building, showcasing, and measuring scholarly reputation74 cited
  • 2020A global questionnaire survey of the scholarly communication attitudes and behaviours of early career researchers64 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.