SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How Tertiary Studies perform Quality Assessment of Secondary Studies in Software Engineering
5 references·0 citing·25 second hop
How Tertiary Studies perform Quality Assessment of Secondary Studies in Software Engineering (2021)How Tertiary Studies perform Quality Asse…Quality Assessment in Systematic Literature Reviews: A Software Engineering Perspective (2020)Quality Assessment in Systema…Search. Review. Repeat? An empirical study of threats to replicating SLR searches (2019)Search. Review. Repeat? An em…A critical appraisal tool for systematic literature reviews in software engineering (2019)A critical appraisal tool for…AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisa…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)External Validation of a Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) (2007)How good are my search strings? Reflections on using an existing review as a quasi-gold standard (2021)Setting Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria (2022)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Automated Selection and Quality Assessment of Primary Studies (2019)A Comparison of Citation Sources for Reference and Citation-Based Search in Systematic Literature Reviews (2022)Examining the influence of financial inclusion on investment decision: A bibliometric review (2024)An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory (1998)Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews (2004)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Evaluation of User Experience in Human–Robot Interaction: A Systematic Literature Review (2023)Monitoring fatigue and drowsiness in motor vehicle occupants using electrocardiogram and heart rate − A systematic review (2024)Key factors influencing educational technology adoption in higher education: A systematic review (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2017AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both10,605 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2020Quality Assessment in Systematic Literature Reviews: A Software Engineering Perspective144 cited
  • 2019Search. Review. Repeat? An empirical study of threats to replicating SLR searches47 cited
  • 2019A critical appraisal tool for systematic literature reviews in software engineering15 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work