SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
16 references·1 citing·35 second hop
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2021)Comparative efficacy and acceptability of…The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an…CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)CINeMA: An approach for asses…RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)RoB 2: a revised tool for ass…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015)The PRISMA Extension Statemen…Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)Graphical Tools for Network M…Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies (2012)Consistency and inconsistency…Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011)Recommendations for examining…Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial (2010)Graphical methods and numeric…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Anxiety Disorders and Phobias: A Cognitive Perspective (1986)Anxiety Disorders and Phobias…A cognitive approach to panic (1986)A cognitive approach to panicAnxiety Disorders and Phobias: A Cognitive Perspective (1985)Anxiety Disorders and Phobias…A general introduction to psychoanalysis. (1920)A general introduction to psy…Evaluation of an Online-Based Self-Help Program for Patients With Panic Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial (2025)Evaluation of an Online-Based…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology (1999)The role of rumination in depressive disorders and mixed anxiety/depressive symptoms. (2000)Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study. (2007)Cognitive Therapy for Depression (2012)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2021The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews107,380 cited
  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 2019RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,067 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2015The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations8,248 cited
  • 2011Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials7,681 cited
  • 2010Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial3,764 cited
  • 1985Anxiety Disorders and Phobias: A Cognitive Perspective2,882 cited
  • 2013Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA2,473 cited
  • 1986A cognitive approach to panic2,421 cited
  • 2012Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: concepts and models for multi‐arm studies2,095 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 2020CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1,923 cited
  • 1986Anxiety Disorders and Phobias: A Cognitive Perspective1,505 cited
  • 1920A general introduction to psychoanalysis.1,484 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2025Evaluation of an Online-Based Self-Help Program for Patients With Panic Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial2 cited