SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A Mixed‐Method Usability Study on User Experience with Systematic Review Software
16 references·0 citing·46 second hop
A Mixed‐Method Usability Study on User Experience with Systematic Review Software (2021)A Mixed‐Method Usability Study on User Ex…Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis (2019)Toward systematic review auto…A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research (2019)A 24-step guide on how to des…Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools (2018)Online tools supporting the c…Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry (2017)Analysis of the time and work…Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Rayyan—a web and mobile app f…Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation (2016)Code Saturation Versus Meanin…Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches (2015)Using text mining for study i…Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)Preferred reporting items for…Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction (2014)Benefits of emotional design …Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare (2013)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center (2012)Deploying an interactive mach…The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The Cochrane Collaboration's …Emotional design in multimedia learning. (2011)Emotional design in multimedi…Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation. (2011)Effect size estimates: Curren…Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews (2010)Semi-automated screening of b…Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review (2003)Five Steps to Conducting a Sy…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Integrated STEM Education: A Systematic Review of Instructional Practices in Secondary Education (2018)Meta-Analytic Methodology for Basic Research: A Practical Guide (2019)Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation (2020)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal (2024)Book Reviews: Keppel, Geoffrey. Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s Handbook . Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice Hall, 1973. 658 + xiii pp. $13.95 (1975)Book Reviews: Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis Larry V. Hedges and Ingram Olkin New York: Academic Press, 1985. xxii + 369 pp (1988)The New Statistics (2013)How Big Is “Big”? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research (2014)How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables (2019)Introduction to Meta‐Analysis (2021)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research (1968)THE DISCOVERY OF GROUNDED THEORY: STRATEGIES FOR QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. By Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. 271 pp. $6.75 (1968)How Many Interviews Are Enough? (2005)Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization (2017)To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales (2019)Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests (2021)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)How can vegetation protect us from air pollution? A critical review on green spaces' mitigation abilities for air-borne particles from a public health perspective - with implications for urban planning (2021)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021)Appraising systematic reviews: a comprehensive guide to ensuring validity and reliability (2023)Systematic Reviews to Support Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Review and Apply Findings of Healthcare Research. (2004)Systematic reviews to support evidence‐based medicine: how to review and apply findings of healthcare research (2004)Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design (2018)A step by step guide for conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis with simulation data (2019)The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints (2020)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (2010)An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (2013)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression, Anxiety, and Enhancement of Psychological Well-Being Among College Students: Systematic Review (2019)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Barriers to and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions: Systematic Review (2021)Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making (2018)The development of software to support multiple systematic review types (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials33,820 cited
  • 2016Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews27,008 cited
  • 2015Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement26,419 cited
  • 2011Effect size estimates: Current use, calculations, and interpretation.5,325 cited
  • 2016Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation4,880 cited
  • 2003Five Steps to Conducting a Systematic Review1,938 cited
  • 2013Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare757 cited
  • 2017Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry733 cited
  • 2015Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches691 cited
  • 2019A 24-step guide on how to design, conduct, and successfully publish a systematic review and meta-analysis in medical research682 cited
  • 2011Emotional design in multimedia learning.648 cited
  • 2019Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis647 cited
  • 2012Deploying an interactive machine learning system in an evidence-based practice center535 cited
  • 2018Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

478 cited
  • 2010Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews356 cited
  • 2014Benefits of emotional design in multimedia instruction329 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.