SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Number and quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics published in the top general medical and obstetrics and gynecology journals
16 references·0 citing·48 second hop
Number and quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics published in the top general medical and obstetrics and gynecology journals (2021)Number and quality of randomized controll…Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future (2020)Retracted articles in the obs…Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination during Pregnancy and Effects in Infants (2020)Respiratory Syncytial Virus V…Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis (2020)Global mapping of randomised …A bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology articles with highest relative citation ratios, 1980 to 2019 (2020)A bibliometric analysis of ob…Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology (2019)Plagiarism and data falsifica…Effect of Addition of an Intimate Partner Violence Intervention to a Nurse Home Visitation Program on Maternal Quality of Life (2019)Effect of Addition of an Inti…Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Prenatal Insomnia (2019)Cognitive Behavioral Therapy …Clinical trial registration was not an indicator for low risk of bias (2017)Clinical trial registration w…Compliance with prospective trial registration guidance remained low in high-impact journals and has implications for primary end point reporting (2016)Compliance with prospective t…Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis (2013)Randomized trials published i…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials (2004)Blinding was judged more diff…Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals (1994)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct (1990)Underreporting Research Is Sc…The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)The Existence of Publication …Design of Experiments (1936)Reporting on Methods in Clinical Trials (1982)Factors that limit the quality, number and progress of randomised controlled trials. (1999)Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions (2002)A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus (2005)Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding (2007)The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration. (2016)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)Outcome Discrepancies and Selective Reporting: Impacting the Leading Journals? (2015)Are dental researchers asking patient-important questions? A scoping review (2016)Examining How Treatment Fidelity Is Supported, Measured, and Reported in K–3 Reading Intervention Research (2017)The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10 (1998)The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. (1998)Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research (2001)Interventions for sleep problems during pregnancy: A systematic review (2019)Moderators of Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia on Depression and Anxiety Outcomes (2022)We know CBT-I works, now what? (2022)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Data integrity of 35 randomised controlled trials in women’ health (2020)Retracted publications and their citation in dental literature: A systematic review (2020)Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers (2021)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Comprehensive Overview of Vaccination during Pregnancy in Europe (2021)Prospective Attitudes towards Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccination: Validation of a Survey Instrument among Young Females in Jordan Pending Vaccine Authorization (2023)Maternal awareness, acceptability and willingness towards respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccination during pregnancy in Ireland (2024)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews (1997)Registering Clinical Trials (2003)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 1990The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence1,413 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 1990Underreporting Research Is Scientific Misconduct552 cited
  • 1994Assessing the Quality of Randomization From Reports of Controlled Trials Published in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals512 cited
  • 2020Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccination during Pregnancy and Effects in Infants422 cited
  • 2004Blinding was judged more difficult to achieve and maintain in nonpharmacologic than pharmacologic trials300 cited
  • 2019Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Prenatal Insomnia145 cited
  • 2019Plagiarism and data falsification are the most common reasons for retracted publications in obstetrics and gynaecology99 cited
  • 2013Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis83 cited
  • 2016Compliance with prospective trial registration guidance remained low in high-impact journals and has implications for primary end point reporting55 cited
  • 2020Retracted articles in the obstetrics literature: lessons from the past to change the future54 cited
  • 2019Effect of Addition of an Intimate Partner Violence Intervention to a Nurse Home Visitation Program on Maternal Quality of Life

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

54 cited
  • 2017Clinical trial registration was not an indicator for low risk of bias49 cited
  • 2020Global mapping of randomised trials related articles published in high-impact-factor medical journals: a cross-sectional analysis38 cited
  • 2020A bibliometric analysis of obstetrics and gynecology articles with highest relative citation ratios, 1980 to 201931 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.