Theory-driven game-based assessment of general cognitive ability: Design theory, measurement, prediction of performance, and test fairness.

Richard N. Landers · Michael B. Armstrong · Andrew B. Collmus · Salih Mujcic · Jason Blaik

75 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Applied Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Cognitive Abilities and Testing Educational Games and Gamification Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

Abstract

-GBA battery but not the reverse. We also show the presence of similar adverse impact for both the traditional test battery and GBA but the absence of differential prediction of criteria. Reactions were more positive across all measures for the g-GBA compared to the traditional test battery. Overall, results support GBA design theory as a promising foundation from which to build high-quality theory-driven GBAs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 75 citations exist upstream.

Cited by

2022Robots are judging me: Perceived fairness of algorithmic recruitment tools 2022Game-related assessments for personnel selection: A systematic review 2024Exploring the role of cognitive load in faking prevention using the dual task paradigm

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.