Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Idiosyncratic use of bottom-up and top-down information leads to differences in speech perception flexibility: Converging evidence from ERPs and eye-tracking

16 references·0 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2011Praat : doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]4,100 cited
1986The TRACE model of speech perception2,964 cited
1964A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements2,592 cited
1998Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model1,941 cited
1991Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not1,326 cited
2000Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary761 cited
2015Robust speech perception: Recognize the familiar, generalize to the similar, and adapt to the novel.636 cited
2005Lexical Information Drives Perceptual Learning of Distorted Speech: Evidence From the Comprehension of Noise-Vocoded Sentences.530 cited
2019Large-scale analysis of test–retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures487 cited
1994Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: Words, phonemes, and features.434 cited
1974Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories418 cited
1984Categorical Perception: Issues, Methods, Findings416 cited
2002Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access398 cited
2006Generalization in perceptual learning for speech350 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2008Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues350 cited

1994The effect of subphonetic differences on lexical access309 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.