SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Irreproducibility in searches of scientific literature: A comparative analysis
16 references·4 citing·36 second hop
Irreproducibility in searches of scientific literature: A comparative analysis (2021)Irreproducibility in searches of scientif…PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021)PRISMA-S: an extension to the…Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources (2019)Which academic search systems…Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Updated guidance for trusted …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2019)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018)Meta-analysis and the science…The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses (2016)The Mass Production of Redund…1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility (2016)1,500 scientists lift the lid…The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching (2015)The Role of Google Scholar in…Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)Growth rates of modern scienc…The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index (2010)The rate of growth in scienti…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (2008)Systematic Review and Meta-an…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses (2007)Comparison of PubMed, Scopus,…Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Guidelines for Systematic Rev…Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis…Harnessing artificial intelligence for efficient systematic reviews: A case study in ecosystem condition indicators (2024)Harnessing artificial intelli…Exploring the impact of digital knowledge, integration and performance on sustainable accounting, reporting and assurance (2024)Exploring the impact of digit…Enhancing systematic literature review adapting ‘double diamond approach’ (2024)Enhancing systematic literatu…What Kinesiology Research is Most Visible to the Academic World? (2022)What Kinesiology Research is …Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews (2016)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: A practical guide (2013)A meta-analysis and model of the relationship between sleep and depression in adolescents: Recommendations for future research and clinical practice (2014)Applying principles of behaviour change to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission (2020)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review (2019)The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners (2020)Reliability and Validity Assessment (1979)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research (2020)An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews (2021)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools (2011)A manifesto for reproducible science (2017)Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences (2018)The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines (2020)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Prevalence of symptoms of depression, anxiety, insomnia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress among populations affected by the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)How to properly use the PRISMA Statement (2021)PRISMA2020 : An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2019Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions14,763 cited
  • 2019Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions7,170 cited
  • 2007Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses5,030 cited
  • 20161,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility4,200 cited
  • 2021PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews3,654 cited
  • 2015The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching2,381 cited
  • 2019Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources2,361 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review and Meta-analysis2,258 cited
  • 1997Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions2,184 cited
  • 2018Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis1,700 cited
  • 2015Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references1,570 cited
  • 2016

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analyses
1,481 cited
  • 2006Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management1,136 cited
  • 2010The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index964 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2024Exploring the impact of digital knowledge, integration and performance on sustainable accounting, reporting and assurance57 cited
    • 2024Enhancing systematic literature review adapting ‘double diamond approach’16 cited
    • 2024Harnessing artificial intelligence for efficient systematic reviews: A case study in ecosystem condition indicators14 cited
    • 2022What Kinesiology Research is Most Visible to the Academic World?13 cited