SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
A TOPSIS—Risk Matrix and Monte Carlo Expert System for Risk Assessment in Engineering Projects
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
A TOPSIS—Risk Matrix and Monte Carlo Expert System for Risk Assessment in Engineering Projects (2021)A TOPSIS—Risk Matrix and Monte Carlo Expe…Schedule Delay Risk Analysis in Construction Projects with a Simulation-Based Expert System (2020)Schedule Delay Risk Analysis …Multi-stage hybrid model for supplier selection and order allocation considering disruption risks and disruptive technologies (2020)Multi-stage hybrid model for …Analyzing the Investments Strategies for Renewable Energies Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Model (2020)Analyzing the Investments Str…Taxonomy of risks in PPP transportation projects: a systematic literature review (2019)Taxonomy of risks in PPP tran…Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach (2018)Risk assessment based on nove…Multi-criteria group decision making under uncertainty: Application in reservoir flood control operation (2017)Multi-criteria group decision…The sustainable development goals report 2016 / United Nations. \ (2016)The sustainable development g…Project Complexity and Risk Management (ProCRiM): Towards modelling project complexity driven risk paths in construction projects (2016)Project Complexity and Risk M…Prioritizing the responses to manage risks in green supply chain: An Indian plastic manufacturer perspective (2015)Prioritizing the responses to…A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process (2014)A new FMEA method by integrat…Risk evaluation of tunneling projects (2012)Risk evaluation of tunneling …Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS (2012)Quantifying risks in a supply…Risk assessment model selection in construction industry (2010)Risk assessment model selecti…On the dynamic use of project performance and schedule risk information during projecttracking (2010)On the dynamic use of project…A new approach for multiple objective decision making (1993)A new approach for multiple o…Multiple Attribute Decision Making (1981)Multiple Attribute Decision M…Earned value in project management (2003)Earned Value Project Management Method and Extensions (2003)A comparison of different project duration forecasting methods using earned value metrics (2005)Construction and evaluation framework for a real-life project database (2014)Support Vector Machine Regression for project control forecasting (2014)A review of methods, techniques and tools for project planning and control (2018)Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment (1970)Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications (1981)Decision Making in a Fuzzy Environment (2007)Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method (2014)Development of TOPSIS Method to Solve Complicated Decision-Making Problems — An Overview on Developments from 2000 to 2015 (2016)Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making (1992)Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment (2000)Building the Resilient Supply Chain (2004)Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014 (2015)Supply chain risk management: a literature review (2015)The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process (2017)Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models (2004)Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy weighted geometric mean (2007)Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP (2011)A novel evidential FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and grey relational projection method (2018)Improving Risk Evaluation in FMEA With Cloud Model and Hierarchical TOPSIS Method (2018)Risk evaluation in failure modes and effects analysis: hybrid TOPSIS and ELECTRE I solutions with Pythagorean fuzzy information (2020)Focus Groups: Theory and Practice (1990)A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management (2005)A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications (2012)A review of application of multi-criteria decision making methods in construction (2014)Critical factors and paths influencing construction workers’ safety risk tolerances (2016)The concept of project complexity—a review (1996)Understanding the key risks in construction projects in China (2007)Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation (2015)Supply chain risk network management: A Bayesian belief network and expected utility based approach for managing supply chain risks (2017)A review of artificial intelligence based risk assessment methods for capturing complexity-risk interdependencies (2019)An improved text mining approach to extract safety risk factors from construction accident reports (2021)Fuzzy hierarchical analysis (1985)Intuitionistic fuzzy sets (1986)On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking (1988)A novel plithogenic TOPSIS- CRITIC model for sustainable supply chain risk management (2019)An integrated plithogenic MCDM approach for financial performance evaluation of manufacturing industries (2020)Improved DEMATEL methodology for effective safety management decision-making (2020)Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making (1981)Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS (2003)Assessing data-driven sustainable supply chain management indicators for the textile industry under industrial disruption and ambidexterity (2021)Improving supply chain resilience through industry 4.0: A systematic literature review under the impressions of the COVID-19 pandemic (2021)Stress testing supply chains and creating viable ecosystems (2021)GIS‐based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature (2006)Implementing the Sustainable Development Goals: A Review of Strategic Tools and Frameworks Available to Organisations (2019)The Impact of 4IR Digital Technologies and Circular Thinking on the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (2020)Integrating Rural Development, Education, and Management: Challenges and Strategies (2024)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1981Multiple Attribute Decision Making8,857 cited
  • 1993A new approach for multiple objective decision making1,042 cited
  • 2016The sustainable development goals report 2016 / United Nations. \482 cited
  • 2012Quantifying risks in a supply chain through integration of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS327 cited
  • 2016Project Complexity and Risk Management (ProCRiM): Towards modelling project complexity driven risk paths in construction projects322 cited
  • 2010Risk assessment model selection in construction industry232 cited
  • 2020Multi-stage hybrid model for supplier selection and order allocation considering disruption risks and disruptive technologies175 cited
  • 2018Risk assessment based on novel intuitionistic fuzzy-hybrid-modified TOPSIS approach171 cited
  • 2014A new FMEA method by integrating fuzzy belief structure and TOPSIS to improve risk evaluation process157 cited
  • 2010On the dynamic use of project performance and schedule risk information during projecttracking137 cited
  • 2012Risk evaluation of tunneling projects128 cited
  • 2020Analyzing the Investments Strategies for Renewable Energies Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Model97 cited
  • 2015Prioritizing the responses to manage risks in green supply chain: An Indian plastic manufacturer perspective87 cited
  • 2017Multi-criteria group decision making under uncertainty: Application in reservoir flood control operation

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

73 cited
  • 2019Taxonomy of risks in PPP transportation projects: a systematic literature review71 cited
  • 2020Schedule Delay Risk Analysis in Construction Projects with a Simulation-Based Expert System62 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.