Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Rigid rules and slippery standards: How the nature of U.S. Supreme Court precedents influences subsequent state court treatments

16 references·1 citing·42 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1992Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis804 cited
1976Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication705 cited
2010Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the U.S. States: A Re-appraisal413 cited
2004Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office?355 cited
2009The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy321 cited
2002Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making293 cited
2006The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court269 cited
2008State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges247 cited
1997The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice229 cited
2002Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study186 cited
1999Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact177 cited
1995Problems with Rules175 cited
2014Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions157 cited
1985RULES AND STANDARDS154 cited
2013The Semiconstrained Court: Public Opinion, the Separation of Powers, and the U.S. Supreme Court's Fear of Nonimplementation151 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1992The Justices of Rules and Standards129 cited

Cited by

2023Order effects and oral argument at the US Supreme Court15 cited