SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Ensuring Quality and Status: Peer Review Practices in Kriterium, A Portal for Quality-Marked Monographs and Edited Volumes in Swedish SSH
16 references·0 citing·50 second hop
Ensuring Quality and Status: Peer Review Practices in Kriterium, A Portal for Quality-Marked Monographs and Edited Volumes in Swedish SSH (2021)Ensuring Quality and Status: Peer Review …The Norwegian Model in Norway (2018)The Norwegian Model in NorwayThe changing forms and expectations of peer review (2018)The changing forms and expect…Taking scholarly books into account, part II: a comparison of 19 European countries in evaluation and funding (2018)Taking scholarly books into a…Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries (2018)Publication patterns in the s…Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities? (2018)Are book publications disappe…Recognition and reward in the academy (2017)Recognition and reward in the…The heterogeneous landscape of bibliometric indicators: Evaluating models for allocating resources at Swedish universities (2016)The heterogeneous landscape o…Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries (2016)Taking scholarly books into a…Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities (2016)Patterns of internationalizat…Open Access and the Humanities (2014)Open Access and the HumanitiesAccountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University (2014)Accountability in context: ef…Four types of research in the humanities: Setting the stage for research quality criteria in the humanities (2012)Four types of research in the…A label for peer‐reviewed books (2012)A label for peer‐reviewed boo…The qualitative content analysis process (2008)The qualitative content analy…Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States (2005)Books in the Digital Age: The…The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome (2001)The Decision-Making Constrain…Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. (1984)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study (2013)Qualitative Content Analysis (2014)The Circular Economy – A new sustainability paradigm? (2016)Zero as a Special Price: The True Value of Free Products (2007)A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing (2020)Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review (2022)The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges (2023)Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system (1977)New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review System (1991)The republic of science in the 1990s (1994)Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research (2009)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance and Resource Allocation in Science (2014)Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life (1995)The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification (1999)Performance-based university research funding systems (2011)Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review (2015)Governing Science (2016)Thinking with indicators. Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences (2017)Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration (1992)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases (2006)The World-Systemic Dynamics of Knowledge Production: The Distribution of Transnational Academic Capital in the Social Sciences (2019)How the Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards Affects What Is Published in JCR-Ranked Communication Journals (2020)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)National Lists of Scholarly Publication Channels: An Overview and Recommendations for Their Construction and Maintenance (2020)The application of bibliometric analyses in the evaluation of social science research. Who benefits from it, and why it is still feasible (2006)Bias in peer review (2012)Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009 (2012)Bibliometric analysis of support vector machines research trend: a case study in China (2019)Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven‐country European study (2020)Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World (2021)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Pandemic publishing: Medical journals strongly speed up their publication process for COVID-19 (2020)Can Large Language Models Provide Useful Feedback on Research Papers? A Large-Scale Empirical Analysis (2024)The Peer Review Process: Past, Present, and Future (2024)Globalization and cultural diversity in the book market: The case of literary translations in the US and in France (2010)The poverty of journal publishing (2012)How fields vary (2017)The New Research Assessment Reform in China and Its Implementation (2020)Gender differences in the aims and impacts of research (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008The qualitative content analysis process26,312 cited
  • 2018Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: evidence from eight European countries308 cited
  • 2014Open Access and the Humanities262 cited
  • 2005Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States236 cited
  • 2001The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome207 cited
  • 2014Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University184 cited
  • 2018The changing forms and expectations of peer review179 cited
  • 2016Patterns of internationalization and criteria for research assessment in the social sciences and humanities146 cited
  • 2018The Norwegian Model in Norway80 cited
  • 2016Taking scholarly books into account: current developments in five European countries79 cited
  • 2018Are book publications disappearing from scholarly communication in the social sciences and humanities?78 cited
  • 2016The heterogeneous landscape of bibliometric indicators: Evaluating models for allocating resources at Swedish universities74 cited
  • 2012Four types of research in the humanities: Setting the stage for research quality criteria in the humanities57 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2017Recognition and reward in the academy57 cited
  • 2012A label for peer‐reviewed books39 cited
  • 2018Taking scholarly books into account, part II: a comparison of 19 European countries in evaluation and funding32 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.